BACKGROUND: Limiting the exposure of kidney transplant recipients to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has potential merit, but there is no clear consensus on the utility of current strategies. In an attempt to aid clarification, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that assessed CNI sparing (minimization or elimination) with mycophenolate as sole adjunctive immunosuppression. METHODS: The search strategy identified trials where CNI sparing was accompanied by the continuation of, or conversion to, mycophenolate and compared with standard or higher dose CNI therapy. Two investigators independently examined each trial for eligibility, quality, and outcome measures. Additional subgroup analyses were assessed: (1) de novo CNI sparing; (2) elective CNI sparing beyond 2 months posttransplantation; and (3) CNI sparing for transplant dysfunction. RESULTS: Nineteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria permitting analysis of 3312 renal transplant recipients with median follow-up of 12 months. CNI sparing significantly improved glomerular filtration rate (weighted mean difference 4.4 mL/min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-5.9, P<0.001); with some evidence, albeit weak, of improved graft survival (odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-1.01, P=0.06). Acute rejection rates were only increased after elective CNI elimination (odds ratio 2.23, 95% CI 1.57-3.17, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in mortality, malignancy or incidence of infections. CONCLUSIONS: CNI sparing strategies with adjunctive mycophenolate may play an important role in kidney transplant recipients. Improvements in short-term graft function, and possibly graft survival, are achievable. Longer term studies are needed to substantiate the short-term benefits, and refining elective CNI elimination protocols may help to reduce the risk of rejection.
BACKGROUND: Limiting the exposure of kidney transplant recipients to calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) has potential merit, but there is no clear consensus on the utility of current strategies. In an attempt to aid clarification, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that assessed CNI sparing (minimization or elimination) with mycophenolate as sole adjunctive immunosuppression. METHODS: The search strategy identified trials where CNI sparing was accompanied by the continuation of, or conversion to, mycophenolate and compared with standard or higher dose CNI therapy. Two investigators independently examined each trial for eligibility, quality, and outcome measures. Additional subgroup analyses were assessed: (1) de novo CNI sparing; (2) elective CNI sparing beyond 2 months posttransplantation; and (3) CNI sparing for transplant dysfunction. RESULTS: Nineteen randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria permitting analysis of 3312 renal transplant recipients with median follow-up of 12 months. CNI sparing significantly improved glomerular filtration rate (weighted mean difference 4.4 mL/min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.9-5.9, P<0.001); with some evidence, albeit weak, of improved graft survival (odds ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-1.01, P=0.06). Acute rejection rates were only increased after elective CNI elimination (odds ratio 2.23, 95% CI 1.57-3.17, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in mortality, malignancy or incidence of infections. CONCLUSIONS: CNI sparing strategies with adjunctive mycophenolate may play an important role in kidney transplant recipients. Improvements in short-term graft function, and possibly graft survival, are achievable. Longer term studies are needed to substantiate the short-term benefits, and refining elective CNI elimination protocols may help to reduce the risk of rejection.
Authors: Lionel Rostaing; Hans H Neumayer; Rafael Reyes-Acevedo; Barbara Bresnahan; Sander Florman; Stefan Vitko; Michael Heifets; Jun Xing; Dolca Thomas; Flavio Vincenti Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: L Frimat; E Cassuto-Viguier; F Provôt; L Rostaing; B Charpentier; K Akposso; M C Moal; P Lang; D Glotz; S Caillard; D Ducloux; C Pouteil-Noble; S Girardot-Seguin; M Kessler Journal: J Transplant Date: 2010-07-28
Authors: Nissar Shaikh; Mohamad Y Khatib; Mohammad A Alwraidat; Dore C Ananthegowda; Muftah Othman; Asra Aroos; Sagar B Jujjavarapu; Saptarshi Banerjee; Zishan Nasir; Ahmed S Mohamed; Moustafa S Elshafei; Muna A Almaslamani; Abdulqadir J Nashwan Journal: Clin Case Rep Date: 2021-07-23