Literature DB >> 19307384

Prediction of mortality in adult emergency department patients with sepsis.

C Vorwerk1, B Loryman, T J Coats, J A Stephenson, L D Gray, G Reddy, L Florence, N Butler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of the abbreviated Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score, the Modified Early Warning (MEW) score and near-patient-test (NPT) lactate levels in predicting 28-day mortality in adult emergency department (ED) patients with sepsis.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of adult ED patients with sepsis admitted to hospital was conducted in a large urban teaching and a district general hospital. Data were collected during four time periods between 1 January 2006 and 31 January 2007. Inclusion criteria were age > or =16 years and an ED diagnosis of sepsis. Primary outcome for all patients was 28-day mortality. Patients were preassigned to risk groups according to their abbreviated MEDS score, MEW score and NPT lactate.
RESULTS: 307 ED patients with sepsis were included in the study. Among these there were 72 deaths (23%). Mortality rates for the low-, moderate- and high-risk groups of the abbreviated MEDS score were 1/63 (1.6%), 48/205 (23.4%) and 23/39 (59.0%) patients. The MEDS score for low-risk patients was 98.6% (95% CI 92.5% to 99.9%) sensitive and 26.5% (95% CI 21.0% to 32.6%) specific and for high-risk patients it was 31.9% (95% CI 21.4% to 44.0%) sensitive and 93.2% (95% CI 89.2% to 96.1%) specific for death within 28 days. Mortality rates for the low- and high-risk MEW score were 20/159 (12.6%) and 52/148 (35.1%) patients. The MEW score for high-risk patients was 72.2% (95% CI 60.4% to 82.1%) sensitive and 59.2% (95% CI 52.6% to 65.5%) specific for mortality. An NPT lactate level of > or =4 mmol/l was 49.1% (95% CI 35.1% to 63.2%) sensitive and 74.3% (95% CI 64.8% to 82.3%) specific for 28-day mortality.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the efficacy of the abbreviated MEDS score, the MEW score and NPT venous lactate levels in predicting 28-day mortality in ED patients with sepsis. The abbreviated MEDS score was found to be the best performing risk assessment model which, with prospective validation, may aid early clinical decision-making in ED patients with sepsis and might affect the outcome from sepsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19307384     DOI: 10.1136/emj.2007.053298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  34 in total

1.  Evaluation of a model to improve collection of blood cultures in patients with sepsis in the emergency room.

Authors:  B Mariani; M Corbella; E Seminari; L Sacco; P Cambieri; F Capra Marzani; I F Martino; M A Bressan; A Muzzi; C Marena; C Tinelli; P Marone
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Automated early warning system for septic shock: the new way to achieve intensive care unit quality improvement?

Authors:  Fábio Ferreira Amorim; Alfredo Nicodemos Cruz Santana
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-01

3.  Fluid volume, lactate values, and mortality in sepsis patients with intermediate lactate values.

Authors:  Vincent Liu; John W Morehouse; Jay Soule; Alan Whippy; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2013-10

4.  A Framework for Patient State Tracking by Classifying Multiscalar Physiologic Waveform Features.

Authors:  Benjamin Vandendriessche; Mustafa Abas; Thomas E Dick; Kenneth A Loparo; Frank J Jacono
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Timing to antibiotic therapy in septic oncologic patients presenting without hypotension.

Authors:  Kathleen Morneau; Gary B Chisholm; Frank Tverdek; Jeffrey Bruno; Katy M Toale
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis.

Authors:  William P T M van Doorn; Patricia M Stassen; Hella F Borggreve; Maaike J Schalkwijk; Judith Stoffers; Otto Bekers; Steven J R Meex
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluation of the modified MEDS, MEWS score and Charlson comorbidity index in patients with community acquired sepsis in the emergency department.

Authors:  Ergün Çıldır; Mehtap Bulut; Halis Akalın; Egemen Kocabaş; Gökhan Ocakoğlu; Şule Akköse Aydın
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.397

8.  Learning a Severity Score for Sepsis: A Novel Approach based on Clinical Comparisons.

Authors:  Kirill Dyagilev; Suchi Saria
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2015-11-05

9.  Preoperative predictors of mortality in adult patients with perforation peritonitis.

Authors:  Ranju Singh; Nishant Kumar; Abhijit Bhattacharya; Homay Vajifdar
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2011-07

10.  Outcome predictors of uncomplicated sepsis.

Authors:  Ewoud Ter Avest; Maarten de Jong; Ineke Brűmmer; Götz Jk Wietasch; Jan C Ter Maaten
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-04-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.