Literature DB >> 19307011

Combination of in vitro bioassays for the determination of cytotoxic and genotoxic potential of wastewater, surface water and drinking water samples.

Bojana Zegura1, Ester Heath, Andrej Cernosa, Metka Filipic.   

Abstract

In this study we evaluated genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of native samples of wastewaters (15 samples), surface waters (28 samples) and potable waters (8 samples) with the SOS/umuC assay with Salmonella typhimurium TA1535/pSK1002 and MTT assay with human hepatoma HepG2 cells. The genotoxicity of selected samples was confirmed with the comet assay with HepG2 cells. In the SOS/umuC assay 13 out of the 51 samples were genotoxic: two effluent samples from chemical industry; one sample of wastewater treatment plant effluent; two hospital wastewater samples; three river water samples and four lake water samples. Six samples were cytotoxic for HepG2 cells: both effluent samples of chemical industry, two wastewater treatment plant effluent samples, and two river water samples, however, only the chemical industry effluent samples were genotoxic and cytotoxic, indicating that different contaminants are responsible for genotoxic and toxic effects. Comparing genotoxicity of river and lake water samples with the chemical analytical data of the presence of the residues of pharmaceutical and personal care products (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, UV filters and disinfectants) in these samples, indicated that the presence of UV filters might be linked to the genotoxicity of these samples. The results showed that the application of the bacterial SOS/umuC assay and mammalian cell assays (MTT and comet assay) with HepG2 cells was suitably sensitive combination of assays to monitor genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of native samples of wastewaters and surface waters. With this study we also confirmed that the toxicity/genotoxicity bioassays should be an integral tool in the evaluation of toxicity of complex wastewaters before the release into environment, as well as for the monitoring of surface water quality, providing data useful in risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19307011     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  18 in total

1.  Urban effluent discharges as causes of public and environmental health concerns in South Africa's aquatic milieu.

Authors:  Timothy Sibanda; Ramganesh Selvarajan; Memory Tekere
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Double-endpoint Genotoxicity Quantification and PAHs Characterization of Drinking Water Source alongside Polluted Yinghe River with High Tumor Mortality.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Chen Guo; Xiao-Li Wang; Zhan-Lu Lv; Lin Fan; Yu-Yan Yang; Xu Li; Jing Qi; Shu-Li Zhao; Xian-Liang Wang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-20

3.  Ecotoxicological assessment of industrial effluent using duckweed (Lemna minor L.) as a test organism.

Authors:  Sandra Radić; Drazenka Stipanicev; Petra Cvjetko; Ivanka Lovrencić Mikelić; Marija Marijanović Rajcić; Sinisa Sirac; Branka Pevalek-Kozlina; Mirjana Pavlica
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Assessment of mutagenic, genotoxic, and cytotoxic potential of water samples of Harike wetland: a Ramsar site in India using different ex vivo biological systems.

Authors:  Jasmit Kaur; Ashun Chaudhary; Rajbir Kaur; Saroj Arora
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Evaluation of the genotoxicity of waters impacted by domestic and industrial effluents of a highly industrialized region of São Paulo State, Brazil, by the comet assay in HTC cells.

Authors:  Bárbara Cassu Manzano; Matheus Mantuanelli Roberto; Márcia Miyuki Hoshina; Amauri Antônio Menegário; Maria Aparecida Marin-Morales
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Evaluation of germination, root growth and cytological effects of wastewater of sugar factory (Afyonkarahisar) using Hordeum vulgare bioassays.

Authors:  Arzu Özkara; Dilek Akyıl; Sevim Feyza Erdoğmuş; Muhsin Konuk
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.513

7.  Automated 3-D Printed Arrays to Evaluate Genotoxic Chemistry: E-Cigarettes and Water Samples.

Authors:  Karteek Kadimisetty; Spundana Malla; James F Rusling
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 7.711

8.  Is the evaluation of "traditional" physicochemical parameters sufficient to explain the potential toxicity of the treated wastewater at sewage treatment plants?

Authors:  M I Vasquez; D Fatta-Kassinos
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Genotoxicity Assessment of Water Samples from the Sungai Dua River in Pulau Pinang, Malaysia, Using the Allium cepa Test.

Authors:  Akeem Akinboro; Kamaruzaman Mohammed; Selestin Rathnasamy; Vijay Raj Muniandy
Journal:  Trop Life Sci Res       Date:  2011-12

10.  Signal transduction disturbance related to hepatocarcinogenesis in mouse by prolonged exposure to Nanjing drinking water.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Jie Sun; Yan Zhang; Shupei Cheng; Xiaowei Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.