Literature DB >> 19306860

Interpretative reports and critical values.

Elisa Piva1, Mario Plebani.   

Abstract

In the clinical laboratory to allow an effective testing process, post-analytical activity can have two goals in trying to improve patient safety: result interpretation and communication of critical values. Both are important issues, and their success requires a cooperative effort. Misinterpretation of laboratory test results or ineffectiveness in their notification can lead to diagnostic errors or errors in identifying patient critical conditions. With the awareness that the incorrect interpretation of tests and the breakdown in the communication of critical values are preventable errors, laboratorians should make every effort to prevent the types of errors that potentially harm patients. In order to improve the reliability of laboratories, we attempt to explain how interpretative reporting and automated notification of critical values can be used to reduce errors. Clinical laboratories can therefore work to improve clinical effectiveness, without forgetting that everything should be designed to provide the best outcomes for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19306860     DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  9 in total

1.  Study of variables affecting critical value notification in a laboratory catering to tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Rachna Agarwal; Neelam Chhillar; Chandra B Tripathi
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2013-11-26

2.  Predictive accuracy of serum total calcium for both critically high and critically low ionized calcium in critical illness.

Authors:  Zhi-De Hu; Yuan-Lan Huang; Mei-Ying Wang; Ge-Ji-Le Hu; Yan-Qiu Han
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  Effect of pre-analytical errors on quality of laboratory medicine at a neuropsychiatry institute in north India.

Authors:  Neelam Chhillar; Sarbjeet Khurana; Rachna Agarwal; Neeraj Kumar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2010-11-16

4.  Heterogeneity of publicly accessible online critical values for therapeutic drugs.

Authors:  Colt M McClain; Richard Owings; Joshua A Bornhorst
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-12-26

5.  Croatian survey on critical results reporting.

Authors:  Lara Milevoj Kopcinovic; Jasenka Trifunović; Tihana Pavosevic; Nora Nikolac
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.313

6.  Multicenter Survey of Physicians' Perception of Interpretative Commenting and Reflective Testing in Nigeria.

Authors:  Lucius Chidiebere Imoh; Chinelo Pamela Onyenekwu; Kenneth Ogar Inaku; Alexander Oghielu Abu; Chibuzo David Tagbo; Idris Yahaya Mohammed; Modupe Akinrele Kuti
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2021-02-28

7.  Clinical Laboratories - Production Factories or Specialized Diagnostic Centers.

Authors:  János Kappelmayer; Judit Tóth
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2016-04-20

8.  Effect of Harm Anchors in Visual Displays of Test Results on Patient Perceptions of Urgency About Near-Normal Values: Experimental Study.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Aaron M Scherer; Holly O Witteman; Jacob B Solomon; Nicole L Exe; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Impact of a Novel Strategy for Critical Values Communication for the Management of Patients Treated with Clozapine.

Authors:  Ruth Cano-Corres; Siddarta Acebillo; Francesc Campos Barreda; Diego J Palao; Eugenio Berlanga-Escalera
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2021-12-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.