Literature DB >> 19306161

Decision by sampling: the role of the decision environment in risky choice.

Neil Stewart1.   

Abstract

Decision by sampling (DbS) is a theory about how our environment shapes the decisions that we make. Here, I review the application of DbS to risky decision making. According to classical theories of risky decision making, people make stable transformations between outcomes and probabilities and their subjective counterparts using fixed psychoeconomic functions. DbS offers a quite different account. In DbS, the subjective value of an outcome or probability is derived from a series of binary, ordinal comparisons with a sample of other outcomes or probabilities from the decision environment. In this way, the distribution of attribute values in the environment determines the subjective valuations of outcomes and probabilities. I show how DbS interacts with the real-world distributions of gains, losses, and probabilities to produce the classical psychoeconomic functions. I extend DbS to account for preferences in benchmark data sets. Finally, in a challenge to the classical notion of stable subjective valuations, I review evidence that manipulating the distribution of attribute values in the environment changes our subjective valuations just as DbS predicts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19306161     DOI: 10.1080/17470210902747112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  21 in total

1.  A Bayesian model of context-sensitive value attribution.

Authors:  Francesco Rigoli; Karl J Friston; Cristina Martinelli; Mirjana Selaković; Sukhwinder S Shergill; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Overrepresentation of extreme events in decision making reflects rational use of cognitive resources.

Authors:  Falk Lieder; Thomas L Griffiths; Ming Hsu
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Goal-directed decision making as probabilistic inference: a computational framework and potential neural correlates.

Authors:  Alec Solway; Matthew M Botvinick
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Distributions of observed death tolls govern sensitivity to human fatalities.

Authors:  Christopher Y Olivola; Namika Sagara
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Decision-Making Deficits in Adolescent Boys with and without Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): an Experimental Assessment of Associated Mechanisms.

Authors:  Tycho J Dekkers; Hilde M Huizenga; Arne Popma; Anika Bexkens; Jacqueline N Zadelaar; Brenda R J Jansen
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2020-04

Review 6.  A Reference-Dependent Computational Model of Anorexia Nervosa.

Authors:  Francesco Rigoli; Cristina Martinelli
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 3.526

7.  Information integration in risky choice: identification and stability.

Authors:  Neil Stewart
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-15

8.  Decision by sampling and memory distinctiveness: range effects from rank-based models of judgment and choice.

Authors:  Gordon D A Brown; William J Matthews
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-11-15

9.  Searching Choices: Quantifying Decision-Making Processes Using Search Engine Data.

Authors:  Helen Susannah Moat; Christopher Y Olivola; Nick Chater; Tobias Preis
Journal:  Top Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-06-01

10.  How to make loss aversion disappear and reverse: tests of the decision by sampling origin of loss aversion.

Authors:  Lukasz Walasek; Neil Stewart
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.