Literature DB >> 19306012

Active management of third stage of labour: a survey of providers' knowledge in southwest Nigeria.

Olufemi T Oladapo1, Adeniran O Fawole, Olabisi M Loto, Omololu Adegbola, Oluwarotimi I Akinola, Moses O Alao, Adewale S Adeyemi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The disparity between current evidence and practice on active management of third stage of labour (AMTSL) demands assessment of providers' knowledge on the subject.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the level and determinant(s) of accurate knowledge of obstetric providers regarding AMTSL.
METHODS: Questionnaire-based survey of 361 labour and delivery professionals in public tertiary obstetric centres in southwest Nigeria.
RESULTS: Female nurses at different cadres accounted for most of the respondents. Majority (90.6%) of the respondents reported being aware of AMTSL as an obstetric intervention and 49.7% were aware of FIGO/ICM recommendation on AMTSL. Out of 13 potential third stage interventions, 102 respondents (28.3%) correctly and exclusively identified the components of AMTSL as defined by FIGO/ICM. Many procedures reserved for treatment of complicated third stage of labour such as manual placental removal (37.7%), blood transfusion (20.2%), bimanual uterine compression (24.7%) and uterine artery ligation (13.9%) were also selected as AMTSL components. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that being in administrative position (adjusted OR: 2.68; CI 1.19-6.02) and frequent compared to rare or no consultation of books, journal and internet sources for information (adjusted OR: 2.58; CI 1.21-5.52) increased the odds of having accurate knowledge of AMTSL while being a nurse/midwife (adjusted OR: 0.15; CI 0.05-0.39), matron (adjusted OR: 0.25; CI 0.08-0.79) or intern (adjusted OR: 0.07; CI 0.01-0.29) compared to postgraduate resident doctors reduced the odds of having accurate knowledge of AMTSL.
CONCLUSION: AMTSL was a familiar but poorly understood intervention among obstetric care providers in this region. Improvement in healthcare quality and practitioners' adherence to recommended guidelines on AMTSL urgently requires educational interventions that target those who provide routine delivery care and organisation of the health care delivery system in such a way that enables providers to act on acquired knowledge.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19306012     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-009-1036-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  5 in total

1.  Experiencing challenges when implementing active management of third stage of labor (AMTSL): a qualitative study with midwives in Accra, Ghana.

Authors:  Stina Mannheimer Schack; Amna Elyas; Gladys Brew; Karen Odberg Pettersson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Knowledge and barriers on correct use of modified guidelines for active management of third stage of labour: a cross sectional survey of nurse-midwives at three referral hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Fatina B Ramadhani; Yilan Liu; Melania Menrad Lembuka
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 0.927

3.  Influence of nursing interventions in improving midwives' knowledge of misoprostol use in the management of postpartum haemorrhage at selected hospitals in Ondo State, Nigeria.

Authors:  Olufunke Mercy Iwaola; Christiana Olanrewaju Sowunmi; Matthew Idowu Olatubi; Gbemisola Bolanle Ogbeye
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-12-17

4.  Obstetric care providers' knowledge, practice and associated factors towards active management of third stage of labor in Sidama Zone, South Ethiopia.

Authors:  Zelalem Tenaw; Zemenu Yohannes; Abdela Amano
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Assessment of Midwife Knowledge, Practice, and Associated Factors towards Active Management of the Third Stage of Labor at Governmental Health Institutions in Tigray Region, Northern Ethiopia, 2018.

Authors:  Getu Engida Wake; Girma Wogie
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.