Literature DB >> 19305778

Spiralling Medical Costs: Why Canada Needs NICE Medicine.

Norman J Temple1.   

Abstract

Healthcare spending in Canada has grown rapidly in recent years, especially for drugs. This paper discusses the causes of the problem and makes policy proposals. Conflicts of interest (COIs) are a frequent occurrence in medical research and lead to bias. Published studies, especially in the area of clinical trials on drugs, are much more likely to produce findings favourable to the drug when funded by the manufacturer. Bias can occur by various means, including inappropriate study design (such as giving a placebo to control subjects rather than an existing drug) and selective publication of results. COIs also frequently occur with clinical practice guidelines. High-priced (particularly new) drugs are often marketed by inappropriate means. Drug costs in Canada could be greatly reduced if doctors prescribed lower-cost alternatives where appropriate (therapeutic substitution). Proposals are made for changes in the regulatory agencies responsible for the approval of drugs, drug marketing and post-marketing surveillance. In addition, a new regulatory agency is proposed that would examine the value of drugs and medical devices in terms of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Such an agency would set the rules for therapeutic substitution and would determine which medical interventions can be used based on agreed cost-effectiveness criteria.

Year:  2007        PMID: 19305778      PMCID: PMC2645173     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  20 in total

1.  Uneasy alliance--clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  T Bodenheimer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-05-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry.

Authors:  Niteesh K Choudhry; Henry Thomas Stelfox; Allan S Detsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 3.  Evidence b(i)ased medicine--selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications.

Authors:  Hans Melander; Jane Ahlqvist-Rastad; Gertie Meijer; Björn Beermann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-31

Review 4.  Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Yan Li; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials.

Authors:  Mohit Bhandari; Jason W Busse; Dianne Jackowski; Victor M Montori; Holger Schünemann; Sheila Sprague; Derek Mears; Emil H Schemitsch; Dianne Heels-Ansdell; P J Devereaux
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service.

Authors:  Steven D Pearson; Michael D Rawlins
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Drug prices and value for money: the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

Authors:  David A Henry; Suzanne R Hill; Anthony Harris
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  "Breakthrough" drugs and growth in expenditure on prescription drugs in Canada.

Authors:  Steven G Morgan; Kenneth L Bassett; James M Wright; Robert G Evans; Morris L Barer; Patricia A Caetano; Charlyn D Black
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-02

Review 9.  Extent and impact of industry sponsorship conflicts of interest in dermatology research.

Authors:  Clifford S Perlis; Michael Harwood; Roy H Perlis
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 11.527

10.  Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists.

Authors:  H T Stelfox; G Chua; K O'Rourke; A S Detsky
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-01-08       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.