Literature DB >> 19305765

Why examining the desirability of health technology matters.

Pascale Lehoux1.   

Abstract

Although technology is ubiquitous in healthcare, its impact on people's perceptions and lives is poorly understood. Fresh insights are required to meet current and future technology-related policy challenges. Keeping a population healthy requires considering not only technologies that are used in clinical settings (diagnostic, therapeutic, palliative), but also those used in the community (home care, self-care, technical aids) and those that affect health more broadly (health promotion technologies, occupational health technologies). At the policy making level, understanding the desirability of health technology may prove to be more important than simply appraising its affordability.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19305765      PMCID: PMC2645152     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  9 in total

1.  The great escape? Prospects for regulating access to technology through health technology assessment.

Authors:  Mira Johri; Pascale Lehoux
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Human tissue engineered products--drugs or devices?

Authors:  Alex Faulkner; Ingrid Geesink; Julie Kent; David FitzPatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-31

3.  Confronting the "gray zones" of technology assessment: evaluating genetic testing services for public insurance coverage in Canada.

Authors:  Mita Giacomini; Fiona Miller; George Browman
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Reflections on the social epidemiologic dimension of health technology assessment.

Authors:  Arminée Kazanjian
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 5.  How place matters: unpacking technology and power in health and social care.

Authors:  B Poland; P Lehoux; D Holmes; G Andrews
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2005-03

6.  Does providing cost-effectiveness information change coverage priorities for citizens acting as social decision makers?

Authors:  Marthe Rachel Gold; Peter Franks; Taryn Siegelberg; Shoshanna Sofaer
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Bringing the patient back in. Guidelines, practice variations, and the social context of medical practice.

Authors:  Ann Lennarson Greer; James S Goodwin; Jean L Freeman; Z Helen Wu
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  The use of technology at home: what patient manuals say and sell vs. what patients face and fear.

Authors:  Pascale Lehoux; Jocelyne Saint-Arnaud; Lucie Richard
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2004-07

9.  Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: a qualitative study in the UK.

Authors:  Ruth Gillian Jepson; Jenny Hewison; Andrew Thompson; David Weller
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 4.634

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  The Bright Elusive Butterfly of Value in Health Technology Development Comment on "Providing Value to New Health Technology: The Early Contribution of Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Regulatory Agencies".

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Nick Fahy; Sara Shaw
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2018-01-01

2.  Ubiquitous health in Korea: progress, barriers, and prospects.

Authors:  Yountae Lee; Hyejung Chang
Journal:  Healthc Inform Res       Date:  2012-12-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.