Literature DB >> 19305730

Mr. Harrington, self-rated health and the canadian chicken.

Robert G Evans1.   

Abstract

The simplest way to find out how healthy people are is to ask them. The question: "Would you rate your health as excellent, very good, good, fair or poor?" is quick and easy (and cheap) to administer, and correlates well with more objective indicators of health (such as subsequent death). But there are significant cross-national differences in response patterns. Canadians are much less likely than Americans to provide extreme responses - excellent or poor. International comparisons yield more striking examples. Americans rate their health among the highest in the OECD, despite mortality measures that are among the worst. The Japanese, with the world's best mortality measures, rate their health near the bottom. Can self-reports be standardized for these cultural effects?

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19305730      PMCID: PMC2585471     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  1 in total

1.  Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England.

Authors:  James Banks; Michael Marmot; Zoe Oldfield; James P Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 56.272

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Does it matter what you measure? Neighbourhood effects in a canadian setting.

Authors:  Leslie L Roos; Jennifer Magoon; Dan Château
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2010-08

2.  Using anchoring vignettes to assess the comparability of self-rated feelings of sadness, lowness or depression in France and Vietnam.

Authors:  G Emmanuel Guindon; Michael H Boyle
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 3.  Self-rated health and ethnicity: focus on indigenous populations.

Authors:  Andrea E Bombak; Sharon G Bruce
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 1.228

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.