Literature DB >> 19305385

Validation of the 4B5 rabbit monoclonal antibody in determining Her2/neu status in breast cancer.

Bert van der Vegt1, Geertruida H de Bock, Joost Bart, Nick G Zwartjes, Jelle Wesseling.   

Abstract

HER2 overexpression in breast cancer is associated with worse clinical outcome. To select patients for anti-Her2-based therapy immunohistochemistry is commonly performed as a first step to assess Her2 status. However, interobserver and interlaboratory variability can significantly compromise adequate assessment of Her2 status. In addition, immunohistochemistry does not always result in an unambiguous test result requiring additional testing for Her2 gene amplification. This study aimed to improve the reliability of Her2 immunohistochemistry by using rabbit monoclonal antibody 4B5 as an alternative to mouse monoclonal antibody CB11 routinely used in our laboratory. Therefore, 283 breast adenocarcinomas were included in a tissue microarray. Immunohistochemistry using the 4B5 and CB11 antibodies, and fluorescence and chromogenic in situ hybridization (FISH or CISH) were performed. Immunohistochemistry was scored by two independent investigators. We found that 4B5 staining was more distinct than CB11 staining. For CB11 staining, there were 12% (BV) and 5% (JW) 2+ scores compared with 4% (BV) and 2% (JW) for 4B5. There was a strong trend towards higher interobserver agreement for 4B5 compared with CB11 (4B5: kappa 0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.96; CB11: kappa 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.88). There were no significant differences in sensitivity, specificity and predictive values between CB11 and 4B5. Our results indicate that the 4B5 antibody provides more robust assessment of immunohistochemical Her2/neu status and will reduce the number of gene amplification tests compared with CB11. However, for tumours with a 2+ score additional gene amplification measurement using FISH or CISH remains necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19305385     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  8 in total

Review 1.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Binding of trastuzumab to ErbB2 is inhibited by a high pericellular density of hyaluronan.

Authors:  Tímea Váradi; Tamás Mersich; Päivi Auvinen; Raija Tammi; Markku Tammi; Ferenc Salamon; István Besznyák; Ferenc Jakab; Zsolt Baranyai; János Szöllősi; Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 3.  Antibody validation.

Authors:  Jennifer Bordeaux; Allison Welsh; Seema Agarwal; Elizabeth Killiam; Maria Baquero; Jason Hanna; Valsamo Anagnostou; David Rimm
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.993

Review 4.  Alternative reagents to antibodies in imaging applications.

Authors:  R Bedford; C Tiede; R Hughes; A Curd; M J McPherson; Michelle Peckham; Darren C Tomlinson
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2017-07-27

Review 5.  From rabbit antibody repertoires to rabbit monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Justus Weber; Haiyong Peng; Christoph Rader
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 8.718

6.  HER2 Status by Standardized Immunohistochemistry and Silver-Enhanced In Situ Hybridization in Korean Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Young Kyung Bae; Gyungyub Gong; Jun Kang; Ahwon Lee; Eun Yoon Cho; Ji Shin Lee; Kwang-Sun Suh; Dong Wha Lee; Woo Hee Jung
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.588

7.  Folate Receptor-Beta Has Limited Value for Fluorescent Imaging in Ovarian, Breast and Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Esther de Boer; Lucia M A Crane; Marleen van Oosten; Bert van der Vegt; Tineke van der Sluis; Paulien Kooijman; Philip S Low; Ate G J van der Zee; Henriette J G Arts; Gooitzen M van Dam; Joost Bart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Chromogenic in situ hybridization compared with other approaches to evaluate HER2/neu status in breast carcinomas.

Authors:  F E Rosa; R M Santos; S R Rogatto; M A C Domingues
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 2.590

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.