Literature DB >> 1930508

How do nurses working in hospital accident and emergency departments perceive local general practitioners? A study in six English hospitals.

J Dale1, J Green.   

Abstract

One hundred and forty-three Accident and Emergency nurses working in six departments in contrasting districts of England completed questionnaires about their perception of local general practice. Much of general practice was perceived as being performed unsatisfactorily. Out-of-hours accessibility, caring for patients with 'difficult' or psychosocial problems, advising on health service usage, and minor surgery and first aid were all thought to be performed particularly badly. In addition, there was considerable inter-district variation with the views expressed in inner London being especially negative. To some extent these views may reflect real short-comings in general practice, but they are likely to be coloured by the disproportionate experience A&E departments inevitably have of patients who are dissatisfied in some way with their GP service. In addition, other factors such as departmental 'culture' and the separation that exists between hospital and community health professionals may have an important influence. The effect such negative perceptions have on the relationship between A&E departments and general practitioners, and the quality of care provided to patients attending A&W with primary care problems are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1930508      PMCID: PMC1285780          DOI: 10.1136/emj.8.3.210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Emerg Med        ISSN: 0264-4924


  6 in total

1.  Normal rubbish: deviant patients in casualty departments.

Authors:  R Jeffery
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  1979-06

2.  Accident department or general practice?

Authors:  T Davies
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-01-25

3.  Inappropriate use of casualty departments.

Authors:  E Horder
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-08

4.  Accident and emergency departments--why people attend with minor injuries and ailments.

Authors:  T C Wood; K S Cliff
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.427

5.  Nurse practitioners. The new pioneers.

Authors:  S Head
Journal:  Nurs Times       Date:  1988 Jun 29-Jul 5

6.  Self referral to an accident and emergency department for another opinion.

Authors:  C S Jones; A McGowan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-04-01
  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Primary care: the old bugbear of accident and emergency services.

Authors:  J Dale
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Attitudes towards general practice and primary care: a survey of senior house officers in accident and emergency.

Authors:  J Dale; S Williams
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-01

3.  Attitudes of Dublin accident and emergency department doctors and nurses towards the services offered by local general practitioners.

Authors:  D Gibney; A W Murphy; M Smith; G Bury; P K Plunkett
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1995-12

4.  The emergency department and the community: a model for improved cooperation.

Authors:  J M Hadfield; D W Yates; A Berry
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Primary care in the accident and emergency department: I. Prospective identification of patients.

Authors:  J Dale; J Green; F Reid; E Glucksman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-12

6.  Paediatric consultation patterns in general practice and the accident and emergency department.

Authors:  T Bradley; B McCann; J F Glasgow; C C Patterson
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1995-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.