Literature DB >> 19304881

Influence of plasma exchange on the disposition of the fourth generation cephalosporin cefepime.

Rami B Ibrahim1, Chin Y Liu, Simon M Cronin, Bridgette C Murphy, Raymond Cha, Paul Swerdlow, Tomoco Avila, Stephen T Smith, Richard A Lewis, David J Edwards.   

Abstract

Cefepime, a fourth generation cephalosporin, is widely used in hematology and oncology patients. These patients may require plasma exchange (PE) for indications such as chemotherapy- or cancer-induced thromobotic thrombocytopenic purpura to name a few. To date, no pharmacokinetic evaluation has been conducted assessing cefepime's disposition during PE. A 2 g IV cefepime single dose was given to patients undergoing therapeutic PE. Two hours from cefepime dose administration, plasma concentration was measured. PE was then instituted and cefepime plasmapheresate concentration was measured at the completion of the PE session. Cefepime levels were measured using HPLC. The percentage removed by PE was calculated as: amount removed/2 g dose. Ten adult patients were analyzed: median age (range): 52 years (33-67) and median weight (range); 82.85 kg (47-120). PE indications were: myasthenia gravis (n = 3), transverse myelitis (n = 2), multiple sclerosis (n = 1), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (n = 1), idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (n = 1), thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (n = 1), and humoral rejection post cadaveric renal allograft (n = 1). All patients except one had a creatinine clearance >60 mL/min. One patient was excluded from the pharmacokinetic analysis owing to loss of venous access during PE. For the remaining nine patients, total plasma volume removed was 3.5 L (range: 2.5-3.5) and duration of PE was 120 min (range: 94-209). The cefepime removed by PE was 3.7% (range: 2.1-6.7). A strong correlation was found between cefepime plasma concentration prior to PE and the amount of drug removed (r = 0.96, r(2) = 0.92; p<0.05). The above results suggest that, under the studied conditions, cefepime removal by PE is clinically insignificant (approximately 4% of total 2 g dose).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19304881     DOI: 10.1177/1078155209103103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  3 in total

Review 1.  Drug Dosing in Patients Undergoing Therapeutic Plasma Exchange.

Authors:  Sherif Hanafy Mahmoud; Jessica Buhler; Eric Chu; Suzie A Chen; Theresa Human
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Is Antimicrobial Treatment Effective During Therapeutic Plasma Exchange? Investigating the Role of Possible Interactions.

Authors:  Łukasz J Krzych; Marcelina Czok; Zbigniew Putowski
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-04-25       Impact factor: 6.321

3.  Extracorporeal Removal of Thermosensitive Liposomal Doxorubicin from Systemic Circulation after Tumor Delivery to Reduce Toxicities.

Authors:  Anjan Motamarry; A Marissa Wolfe; Krishna K Ramajayam; Sanket Pattanaik; Thomas Benton; Yuri Peterson; Pegah Faridi; Punit Prakash; Katherine Twombley; Dieter Haemmerich
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.639

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.