Literature DB >> 19304880

Pharmacokinetics of a granisetron transdermal system for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.

Julian Howell1, Jean Smeets, Henk-Jan Drenth, David Gill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of granisetron transdermal formulation and examine its possible relationship with age, gender, and renal function.
METHODS: This article describes a Phase I PK study and a post hoc pooled population PK analysis. The Phase I study was a randomized, cross-over study that assessed PK parameters of three granisetron patch sizes and oral granisetron. The pooled population PK analysis included data from three trials in healthy subjects (n = 48) and from Phase II and III studies in patients with cancer (n = 793). The population PK model was used to investigate granisetron exposure and its possible relationship with age, gender, and renal function.
RESULTS: Following oral dosing, plasma granisetron concentration was quantifiable at 1 h, and maximal mean concentration (4.7 ng/mL) was reached 2 h after administration. With transdermal application, maximal concentration was reached 48 h post-application; t(1/2) was 36 h. With oral dosing, overall exposure after 5 days was 306 ng/mL.h, and C(avg) 2.6 ng/mL. This corresponded to an AUC(0-infinity) for the 52 cm(2) patch of 420 ng/mL.h and C(avg) 2.2 ng/mL over 6 days. Clearance was not affected by age, gender, weight, or renal function.
CONCLUSION: The 52 cm( 2) granisetron patch achieves a similar exposure to that of a 2 mg oral dose and provides continuous delivery of granisetron over 6 days. The patch may have utility in treating chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting where prolonged drug delivery is advantageous. No dose adjustments would be needed based on age or renal function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19304880     DOI: 10.1177/1078155209104063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract        ISSN: 1078-1552            Impact factor:   1.809


  10 in total

1.  Population pharmacokinetic model of transdermal nicotine delivered from a matrix-type patch.

Authors:  Matthew W Linakis; Joseph E Rower; Jessica K Roberts; Eleanor I Miller; Diana G Wilkins; Catherine M T Sherwin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  A randomized study of the efficacy and safety of transdermal granisetron in the control of nausea and vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in Korean patients.

Authors:  Jeong Eun Kim; Yong Sang Hong; Jae-Lyun Lee; Kyu-Pyo Kim; Seong Joon Park; Sun Jin Sym; Dong Bok Shin; Jeeyun Lee; Young Suk Park; Jin Seok Ahn; Tae Won Kim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Transdermal granisetron.

Authors:  Sean T Duggan; Monique P Curran
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Transdermal granisetron versus palonosetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, cross-over, active-controlled, and phase IV study.

Authors:  Young Mi Seol; Hyo Jeong Kim; Young Jin Choi; Eun Mi Lee; Yang Soo Kim; Sung Yong Oh; Su Jin Koh; Jin Ho Baek; Won Sik Lee; Young Don Joo; Hyun Gi Lee; Eun Young Yun; Joo Seop Chung
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Use of granisetron transdermal system in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a review.

Authors:  Albert Tuca
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.989

6.  Efficacy and tolerability of transdermal granisetron for the control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately and highly emetogenic multi-day chemotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, phase III study.

Authors:  Ralph V Boccia; Lucio N Gordan; Gemma Clark; Julian D Howell; Steven M Grunberg
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-09-12       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  A phase III study of transdermal granisetron versus oral ondansetron for women with gynecologic cancers receiving pelvic chemoradiation.

Authors:  Shannon D Armbruster; Bryan M Fellman; Anuja Jhingran; Patricia J Eifel; Ann H Klopp; Robert L Coleman; Lois M Ramondetta; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Use of transdermal and intravenous granisetron and the ability of the Hesketh score to assess nausea and vomiting induced by multiday chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ralph V Boccia; Gemma Clark; Julian D Howell
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Use and cardiovascular safety of transdermal and other granisetron preparations in cancer management.

Authors:  Jay W Mason; Thomas E Moon
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 10.  Recent advances in antiemetics: new formulations of 5HT3-receptor antagonists.

Authors:  James Gilmore; Steven D'Amato; Niesha Griffith; Lee Schwartzberg
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.989

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.