Literature DB >> 19304709

Molecular imaging and quantitative measurement of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in live cancer cells using immunolabeled gold nanoparticles.

Matthew J Crow1, Gerald Grant, James M Provenzale, Adam Wax.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to assess whether immunolabeled nanoparticle biomarkers are comparable to fluorescent marker imaging in measuring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: EGFR expression was quantified using both imaging methods in four cell lines: A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells, which are known to have high EGFR expression; two cell lines with lower EGFR expression (270-GBM human glioblastoma xenograft cells and H2224 human glioblastoma xenograft cells); and MDA-MB-453 breast carcinoma cells, which do not express EGFR. To enhance contrast of the nanoparticle biomarkers, a darkfield microspectroscopy system was used that includes a custom epi-illumination light train.
RESULTS: Nanoparticle-bound cells were clearly distinguished from control cells not bound to nanoparticles in that they showed a significant increase in detected intensity under darkfield illumination due to nanoparticle scattering. The average nanoparticle-scattering intensity for A431 cells was 41.5 counts per cell compared with 24.7 for 270-GBM cells, 8.77 for H2224 cells, and 0.44 for MDA-MB-453 cells. The average fluorescence intensity for A431 cells was 35.3 counts per cell compared with 28.7 for 270-GBM cells, 5.91 for H2224 cells, and 2.07 for MDA-MB-453 cells. A plot of fluorescence intensity versus nanoparticle-scattering intensity for all four cell lines showed that the data agree with a linear relationship given by the following equation: NP = 1.0691 x FL - 0.3873, where NP is the nanoparticle-scattering intensity and FL is the fluorescence intensity. The covariance of the data with the trend line was R(2) = 0.9409. The average peak wavelength of nanoparticle scattering was 570.93 nm for A431 cells, 565.26 nm for 270-GBM cells, and 562.70 nm for H2224 cells (with no clear peaks observed for MDA-MB-453 cells). This spectral trend shows that nanoparticle scattering may reveal additional information about their nanoenvironment via refractive index sensitivity.
CONCLUSION: Immunolabeled nanoparticles can quantify receptor expression with performance comparable to fluorescence markers and show promise to better characterize receptor expression via their refractive index sensitivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19304709     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  14 in total

1.  Hyperspectral molecular imaging of multiple receptors using immunolabeled plasmonic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Kevin Seekell; Matthew J Crow; Stella Marinakos; Julie Ostrander; Ashutosh Chilkoti; Adam Wax
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Comparative review of interferometric detection of plasmonic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Adam Wax; Amihai Meiri; Siddarth Arumugam; Matthew T Rinehart
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  An atlas of histone deacetylase expression in breast cancer: fluorescence methodology for comparative semi-quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Katherine Ververis; Tom C Karagiannis
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Illuminating epidermal growth factor receptor densities on filopodia through plasmon coupling.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Svetlana V Boriskina; Hongyun Wang; Björn M Reinhard
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 5.  Optimization of immunolabeled plasmonic nanoparticles for cell surface receptor analysis.

Authors:  Kevin Seekell; Hillel Price; Stella Marinakos; Adam Wax
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  Quantifying lipid contents in enveloped virus particles with plasmonic nanoparticles.

Authors:  Amin Feizpour; Xinwei Yu; Hisashi Akiyama; Caitlin M Miller; Ethan Edmans; Suryaram Gummuluru; Björn M Reinhard
Journal:  Small       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 13.281

7.  Optical sizing of immunolabel clusters through multispectral plasmon coupling microscopy.

Authors:  Hongyun Wang; Guoxin Rong; Bo Yan; Linglu Yang; Björn M Reinhard
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 11.189

8.  Feasibility study of brain tumor delineation using immunolabeled gold nanorods.

Authors:  Kevin Seekell; Spencer Lewis; Christy Wilson; Shuqin Li; Gerald Grant; Adam Wax
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Quantification of differential ErbB1 and ErbB2 cell surface expression and spatial nanoclustering through plasmon coupling.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Xinwei Yu; Svetlana V Boriskina; Björn M Reinhard
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 11.189

10.  Scavenger receptor mediated endocytosis of silver nanoparticles into J774A.1 macrophages is heterogeneous.

Authors:  Hongyun Wang; Linxi Wu; Björn M Reinhard
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.