Literature DB >> 19304501

Immune response induced by fluorescent nanocrystal quantum dots in vitro and in vivo.

Akiyoshi Hoshino1, Sanshiro Hanada, Noriyoshi Manabe, Toshinori Nakayama, Kenji Yamamoto.   

Abstract

Fluorescent nanocrystal quantum dots (QDs) are widely used as novel tools in various biological fields including cellular biology, molecular biology, and even in basic and clinical medical fields, due to their far brighter photoemission and photostability. Although many amounts of biological studies, including in vivo experiments, were circumstantially investigated, there is no informative report that investigates whether the QDs affect the mammalian immune system. This study investigated the immune response and biological behavior of QDs in vitro and in vivo. The immune response to QDs by both lymphocytes and kinds of macrophages in vitro and in vivo was investigated. Co-culture of QDs with immune cells showed that apparently normal production of cytokines and chemokines in both mouse CD4+ lymphocytes and peritoneal F4/80+ macrophages (PM phi). In addition, the bionanocomplex of QDs with enhanced-green-fluorescent-protein (eGFP)-encoding nucleotides successfully induced the expression of eGFP protein by PM phi. However, direct injection of QD+nucleotides bionanocomplex aqueous solution into the peritoneal cavity of mice resulted in the inflammation with the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the peritoneal cavity. Furthermore, QD+nucleotides bionanocomplex (but not QD bionanocomplex without nucleotides), induced the production of both proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines by PM phi in vitro. These results indicated that QDs covered with nucleotides caused the peritoneal inflammation in vivo via activation of PM phi and probably nonimmune cells. Taken together, these data indicated that QDs affect the proliferation of immune cells, but not in immune response including cytokine production. We propose here that all nanotechnology researchers should confirm the biological responses of their nanoscale products, because the biological response against nanoscale products can be occurred by not only in immune cells but also other nonimmune cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19304501     DOI: 10.1109/TNB.2009.2016550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Nanobioscience        ISSN: 1536-1241            Impact factor:   2.935


  5 in total

1.  Quantum dots trigger immunomodulation of the NFκB pathway in human skin cells.

Authors:  Amelia A Romoser; Patricia L Chen; J Michael Berg; Christopher Seabury; Ivan Ivanov; Michael F Criscitiello; Christie M Sayes
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 4.407

2.  Quantum dots for molecular diagnostics of tumors.

Authors:  T A Zdobnova; E N Lebedenko; S М Deyev
Journal:  Acta Naturae       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.845

3.  PEGylation of zinc nanoparticles amplifies their ability to enhance olfactory responses to odorant.

Authors:  Melissa Singletary; Samantha Hagerty; Shin Muramoto; Yasmine Daniels; William A MacCrehan; Gheorghe Stan; June W Lau; Oleg Pustovyy; Ludmila Globa; Edward E Morrison; Iryna Sorokulova; Vitaly Vodyanoy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Immunotherapeutic nanoparticles: From autoimmune disease control to the development of vaccines.

Authors:  Romina Mitarotonda; Exequiel Giorgi; Tatiane Eufrasio-da-Silva; Alireza Dolatshahi-Pirouz; Yogendra Kumar Mishra; Ali Khademhosseini; Martin F Desimone; Mauricio De Marzi; Gorka Orive
Journal:  Biomater Adv       Date:  2022-04-22

Review 5.  Immunomodulation of nanoparticles in nanomedicine applications.

Authors:  Qing Jiao; Liwen Li; Qingxin Mu; Qiu Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.