Literature DB >> 19303634

Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials.

Mark A Hlatky1, Derek B Boothroyd, Dena M Bravata, Eric Boersma, Jean Booth, Maria M Brooks, Didier Carrié, Tim C Clayton, Nicolas Danchin, Marcus Flather, Christian W Hamm, Whady A Hueb, Jan Kähler, Sheryl F Kelsey, Spencer B King, Andrzej S Kosinski, Neuza Lopes, Kathryn M McDonald, Alfredo Rodriguez, Patrick Serruys, Ulrich Sigwart, Rodney H Stables, Douglas K Owens, Stuart J Pocock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are alternative treatments for multivessel coronary disease. Although the procedures have been compared in several randomised trials, their long-term effects on mortality in key clinical subgroups are uncertain. We undertook a collaborative analysis of data from randomised trials to assess whether the effects of the procedures on mortality are modified by patient characteristics.
METHODS: We pooled individual patient data from ten randomised trials to compare the effectiveness of CABG with PCI according to patients' baseline clinical characteristics. We used stratified, random effects Cox proportional hazards models to test the effect on all-cause mortality of randomised treatment assignment and its interaction with clinical characteristics. All analyses were by intention to treat.
FINDINGS: Ten participating trials provided data on 7812 patients. PCI was done with balloon angioplasty in six trials and with bare-metal stents in four trials. Over a median follow-up of 5.9 years (IQR 5.0-10.0), 575 (15%) of 3889 patients assigned to CABG died compared with 628 (16%) of 3923 patients assigned to PCI (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.82-1.02; p=0.12). In patients with diabetes (CABG, n=615; PCI, n=618), mortality was substantially lower in the CABG group than in the PCI group (HR 0.70, 0.56-0.87); however, mortality was similar between groups in patients without diabetes (HR 0.98, 0.86-1.12; p=0.014 for interaction). Patient age modified the effect of treatment on mortality, with hazard ratios of 1.25 (0.94-1.66) in patients younger than 55 years, 0.90 (0.75-1.09) in patients aged 55-64 years, and 0.82 (0.70-0.97) in patients 65 years and older (p=0.002 for interaction). Treatment effect was not modified by the number of diseased vessels or other baseline characteristics.
INTERPRETATION: Long-term mortality is similar after CABG and PCI in most patient subgroups with multivessel coronary artery disease, so choice of treatment should depend on patient preferences for other outcomes. CABG might be a better option for patients with diabetes and patients aged 65 years or older because we found mortality to be lower in these subgroups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19303634     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60552-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  142 in total

1.  Surgical ineligibility and mortality among patients with unprotected left main or multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Stephen W Waldo; Eric A Secemsky; Cashel O'Brien; Kevin F Kennedy; Eugene Pomerantsev; Thoralf M Sundt; Edward J McNulty; Benjamin M Scirica; Robert W Yeh
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  [Modern coronary surgery, the SYNTAX trial and updated guidelines].

Authors:  A Thiem; T Attmann; J Cremer
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Revascularization options: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  David R Holmes; Charanjit S Rihal
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Coronary artery disease: Risk models for revascularization--the search continues.

Authors:  Seung-Jung Park; Cheol Whan Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 5.  Revascularization for left main and multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era: integration of recent drug-eluting stent trials.

Authors:  Samip Vasaiwala; David O Williams
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

6.  Best way to revascularize patients with main stem and three vessel lesions: patients should undergo PCI!

Authors:  Volker Schächinger; Christian Herdeg; Bruno Scheller
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly.

Authors:  Tracy Y Wang; Antonio Gutierrez; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 8.  Coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Doron Aronson; Elazer R Edelman
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.213

9.  Composite outcomes in coronary bypass surgery versus percutaneous intervention.

Authors:  Fred H Edwards; David M Shahian; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Frederick L Grover; John E Mayer; Sean M O'Brien; Elizabeth DeLong; Eric D Peterson; Charles McKay; Richard E Shaw; Kirk N Garratt; George D Dangas; John Messenger; Lloyd W Klein; Jeffrey J Popma; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Impact of drug-eluting stents on the comparative effectiveness of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Mark A Hlatky; Derek B Boothroyd; Laurence C Baker; Alan S Go
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.