OBJECTIVE: An optimal administration protocol to induce a maximal effect of anesthetic preconditioning has not been evaluated to date. In this study, desflurane preconditioning was characterized with respect to its threshold, dose dependency, and continuous versus repetitive application. Furthermore, the role of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors in anesthetic preconditioning was tested. DESIGN: A randomized controlled study. SETTING: Laboratory study in a University hospital. SUBJECTS: New Zealand white rabbits in vivo. INTERVENTIONS: Systemic hemodynamics were continuously measured. Rabbits were subjected to 30 minutes of coronary artery occlusion and 3 hours of reperfusion. Animals received desflurane continuously for 30 minutes at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5; desflurane for 90 minutes at 0.5 or 1.5 MAC; or repetitively for three 10-minute periods at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 MAC before coronary occlusion. The beta(2)-adrenergic receptor blocker ICI 118,551 (0.2 mg/kg) or saline placebo was given in the absence or presence of 1.0 MAC desflurane. Myocardial infarct size was measured with triphenyltetrazolium staining. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Myocardial infarct size was 61% +/- 5% in control experiments. Desflurane, administered continuously at 0.5 MAC for 30 minutes (52% +/- 4%) or 90 minutes (56% +/- 8%) had no effect, whereas 0.5 MAC of desflurane given repetitively reduced infarct size to 36% +/- 7%. Desflurane administered continuously for 30 minutes at 1.0 or 1.5 MAC reduced infarct size to 35% +/- 5% and 39% +/- 4%, respectively. Repetitive application at 1.0 MAC (37% +/- 6%) or 1.5 MAC (29% +/- 4%) and continuous administration of 1.5 MAC for 90 minutes (32% +/- 6%) did not result in further infarct size reduction. ICI 118,551 did not affect infarct size (53% +/- 2%) but abolished desflurane preconditioning (51% +/- 5%). CONCLUSION: beta(2)-Adrenergic receptors mediate desflurane-induced preconditioning. Desflurane-induced preconditioning has a threshold that can be lowered by repetitive administration.
OBJECTIVE: An optimal administration protocol to induce a maximal effect of anesthetic preconditioning has not been evaluated to date. In this study, desflurane preconditioning was characterized with respect to its threshold, dose dependency, and continuous versus repetitive application. Furthermore, the role of beta(2)-adrenergic receptors in anesthetic preconditioning was tested. DESIGN: A randomized controlled study. SETTING: Laboratory study in a University hospital. SUBJECTS: New Zealand white rabbits in vivo. INTERVENTIONS: Systemic hemodynamics were continuously measured. Rabbits were subjected to 30 minutes of coronary artery occlusion and 3 hours of reperfusion. Animals received desflurane continuously for 30 minutes at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5; desflurane for 90 minutes at 0.5 or 1.5 MAC; or repetitively for three 10-minute periods at 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 MAC before coronary occlusion. The beta(2)-adrenergic receptor blocker ICI 118,551 (0.2 mg/kg) or saline placebo was given in the absence or presence of 1.0 MAC desflurane. Myocardial infarct size was measured with triphenyltetrazolium staining. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Myocardial infarct size was 61% +/- 5% in control experiments. Desflurane, administered continuously at 0.5 MAC for 30 minutes (52% +/- 4%) or 90 minutes (56% +/- 8%) had no effect, whereas 0.5 MAC of desflurane given repetitively reduced infarct size to 36% +/- 7%. Desflurane administered continuously for 30 minutes at 1.0 or 1.5 MAC reduced infarct size to 35% +/- 5% and 39% +/- 4%, respectively. Repetitive application at 1.0 MAC (37% +/- 6%) or 1.5 MAC (29% +/- 4%) and continuous administration of 1.5 MAC for 90 minutes (32% +/- 6%) did not result in further infarct size reduction. ICI 118,551 did not affect infarct size (53% +/- 2%) but abolished desflurane preconditioning (51% +/- 5%). CONCLUSION: beta(2)-Adrenergic receptors mediate desflurane-induced preconditioning. Desflurane-induced preconditioning has a threshold that can be lowered by repetitive administration.
Authors: Kirsten F Smit; Daniel Brevoord; Stefan De Hert; Bas A de Mol; Raphaela P Kerindongo; Susan van Dieren; Wolfgang S Schlack; Markus W Hollmann; Nina C Weber; Benedikt Preckel Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2016-10-14 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Philip M Jones; Daniel Bainbridge; Michael W A Chu; Philip S Fernandes; Stephanie A Fox; Ivan Iglesias; Bob Kiaii; Ronit Lavi; John M Murkin Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 6.713