BACKGROUND: Salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) for radiorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) is a second local treatment with curative intent in patients with true organ-confined recurrent PCa. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated preoperative prognostic risk factors to predict organ-confined, locally recurrent PCa after primary radiotherapy (RT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five men with biopsy-proven, locally recurrent PCa underwent SRP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) after external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or low- or high-dose brachytherapy. MEASUREMENTS: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score prior to RT and SRP, PSA nadir, time to recurrence, PSA doubling time (PSA DT), PSA prior to surgery, and pathohistology of the SRP specimen were analysed to predict organ-confined recurrent disease. Uni- and multivariate statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Forty (72.7%) and 15 (27.3%) patients demonstrated organ-confined and locally advanced PCa, respectively. Eleven patients (20%) and seven patients (12.7%) had lymph node metastases and positive surgical margins (PSM), respectively. On multivariate analysis, biopsy Gleason score prior to SRP (p=0.02), <50% positive biopsy cores (p=0.001), PSA DT >12 mo (p=0.001), and low-dose brachytherapy (p=0.001) were significant predictors of organ-confined PCa with negative surgical margins (NSM). Limitations of the study are its retrospective nature and the relatively low number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: SRP is a surgically challenging but effective secondary local treatment of radiorecurrent PCa with curative intent. The identified predictive parameters will help to select patients most suitable for SRP with long-term cure and good functional outcome. 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP) for radiorecurrent prostate cancer (PCa) is a second local treatment with curative intent in patients with true organ-confined recurrent PCa. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated preoperative prognostic risk factors to predict organ-confined, locally recurrent PCa after primary radiotherapy (RT). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five men with biopsy-proven, locally recurrent PCa underwent SRP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) after external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or low- or high-dose brachytherapy. MEASUREMENTS: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score prior to RT and SRP, PSA nadir, time to recurrence, PSA doubling time (PSA DT), PSA prior to surgery, and pathohistology of the SRP specimen were analysed to predict organ-confined recurrent disease. Uni- and multivariate statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Forty (72.7%) and 15 (27.3%) patients demonstrated organ-confined and locally advanced PCa, respectively. Eleven patients (20%) and seven patients (12.7%) had lymph node metastases and positive surgical margins (PSM), respectively. On multivariate analysis, biopsy Gleason score prior to SRP (p=0.02), <50% positive biopsy cores (p=0.001), PSA DT >12 mo (p=0.001), and low-dose brachytherapy (p=0.001) were significant predictors of organ-confined PCa with negative surgical margins (NSM). Limitations of the study are its retrospective nature and the relatively low number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: SRP is a surgically challenging but effective secondary local treatment of radiorecurrent PCa with curative intent. The identified predictive parameters will help to select patients most suitable for SRP with long-term cure and good functional outcome. 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors: Matthew R Cooperberg; Naren R Ramakrishna; Steven B Duff; Kathleen E Hughes; Sara Sadownik; Joseph A Smith; Ashutosh K Tewari Journal: BJU Int Date: 2012-12-28 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Daher C Chade; Shahrokh F Shariat; Angel M Cronin; Caroline J Savage; R Jeffrey Karnes; Michael L Blute; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Henk G van der Poel; Hendrik Van Poppel; Steven Joniau; Guilherme Godoy; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Martin E Gleave; Marcos Dall'Oglio; Miguel Srougi; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2011-03-21 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Samuel D Kaffenberger; Kirk A Keegan; Neil K Bansal; Todd M Morgan; Dominic H Tang; Daniel A Barocas; David F Penson; Rodney Davis; Peter E Clark; Sam S Chang; Michael S Cookson; S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith Journal: J Urol Date: 2012-09-20 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: G Gugliemetti; R Sukhu; M A Conca Baenas; J Meeks; D D Sjoberg; J A Eastham; P T Scardino; K Touijer Journal: Actas Urol Esp Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 0.994