Literature DB >> 19303181

Mechanical comparison of biodegradable femoral fixation devices for hamstring tendon graft--a biomechanical study in a porcine model.

Jia-Lin Wu1, Tsu-Te Yeh, Hsain-Chung Shen, Cheng-Kung Cheng, Chian-Her Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initial fixation strength is critical for the early post-operative rehabilitation of patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. However, even the best femoral fixation devices remain controversial. We compared the biomechanical characteristics of tendon grafts fixed by different biodegradable femoral fixation devices following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
METHODS: The Bio-TransFix, Rigidfix, Bioscrew with EndoPearl augmentation and Bioscrew devices were used to fix porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendon grafts in 32 porcine femora. Displacement of each tendon graft was evaluated after cyclic loading testing. Stiffness, ultimate failure load and failure mode of these fixation devices were measured with load-to-failure testing.
FINDINGS: The displacement of the femur-graft-cement complex in response to cyclic loading was lower (P<0.05) for the Bio-TransFix than the Rigidfix, Bioscrew with EndoPearl augmentation, and Bioscrew groups. The fixation stiffness values of the Rigidfix and the Bioscrew were significantly greater (P<0.05) than that of the Bio-TransFix. The ultimate failure load was significantly greater for the Bio-TransFix and the Rigidfix than the Bioscrew with EndoPearl augmentation or the Bioscrew (P<0.05).
INTERPRETATION: The Bio-TransFix provided the least graft displacement under cyclic loading. However, this device gave less stability. The Rigidfix device provided better stability and stiffness of the tendon graft among those fixation devices that showed no significant differences in graft displacement under cyclic loading. However, no single fixation device provided less displacement along with a larger failure load and stiffness in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19303181     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  4 in total

1.  The fixation strength of a novel ACL soft-tissue graft fixation device compared with conventional interference screws: a biomechanical study in vitro.

Authors:  Camilla Halewood; Michael T Hirschmann; Simon Newman; Jaffar Hleihil; Gershon Chaimski; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Comparison between hamstring autograft and free tendon Achilles allograft: minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using EndoButton and Intrafix.

Authors:  Jung Ho Noh; Seung Rim Yi; Sang Jun Song; Seong Wan Kim; Woo Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autologous hamstring single-bundle Rigidfix technique compared with single-bundle Transfix technique.

Authors:  Mousavi Hamid; Mohammadi Majid
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2012-07-16

4.  One-Year Serial Follow-up Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of RigidFix for Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jung Ho Noh; Jae Woo Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-09-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.