Literature DB >> 19303180

The efficacy of a removable vacuum-cushioned cast replacement system in reducing plantar forefoot pressures in diabetic patients.

S A Bus1, R Waaijman, M Arts, H Manning.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the plantar forefoot offloading efficacy of a new prefabricated vacuum-cushioned cast replacement system designed for foot ulcer treatment in neuropathic diabetic patients.
METHODS: Fifteen diabetic subjects with peripheral neuropathy underwent in-shoe plantar pressure assessment while walking in five different footwear types: a standard vacuum-cushioned system with instantly moldable vacuum cushion and roller outsole, two modified vacuum-cushioned systems, one with flat surface vacuum cushion and one with flat outsole, a forefoot offloading shoe, and a control shoe. Regional peak pressures, pressure-time integrals, and inter-regional load transfers were calculated to determine the mechanical action of the footwear. Perceived walking comfort was tested using a 10-point visual analogue scale.
FINDINGS: Forefoot peak pressures and pressure-time integrals were significantly lower (by 41-56%) in the vacuum-cushioned system compared to control. Compared to the forefoot offloading shoe, the vacuum-cushioned system showed significantly higher metatarsal head peak pressures, similar metatarsal head pressure-time integrals, and significantly lower hallux peak pressures and pressure-time integrals. A major transfer of forefoot load to the midfoot explained the offloading efficacy of the vacuum-cushioned system. Few significant differences were present between the modified and standard vacuum-cushioned systems. Perceived walking comfort was significantly higher in the vacuum-cushioned system (score 6.6) than in the forefoot offloading shoe (score 3.4).
INTERPRETATION: The results showed that the vacuum-cushioned cast replacement system was effective in offloading the plantar forefoot of diabetic patients at risk for ulceration, although the contribution of the instantly moldable vacuum cushion and roller outsole were relatively small. The combined peak pressure, pressure-time integral and walking comfort results indicate that the vacuum-cushioned system may be a useful alternative for the forefoot offloading shoe in offloading the plantar diabetic forefoot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19303180     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  5 in total

1.  Factors associated with adherence to using removable cast walker treatment among patients with diabetes-related foot ulcers.

Authors:  Anas Ababneh; Kathleen Finlayson; Helen Edwards; Peter A Lazzarini
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2022-02

2.  Plantar loading reflects ulceration risks of diabetic foot with toe deformation.

Authors:  Y C Lu; Q C Mei; Y D Gu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Load Transference with the Gain of Excessive Body Mass: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Ruoyi Li; Qingyun Liu; Xuecan Chen; Shiyang Yan; Yihong Zhao; Linshan Zhang; Jitka Badurova; Luming Yang; Haojun Fan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The effect of removing plugs and adding arch support to foam based insoles on plantar pressures in people with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Tung-Liang Lin; Huey-Min Sheen; Chin-Teng Chung; Sai-Wei Yang; Shih-Yi Lin; Hong-Ji Luo; Chung-Yu Chen; I-Cheng Chan; Hsu-Sheng Shih; Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 2.303

5.  Plantar pressure in diabetic peripheral neuropathy patients with active foot ulceration, previous ulceration and no history of ulceration: a meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Malindu Eranga Fernando; Robert George Crowther; Elise Pappas; Peter Anthony Lazzarini; Margaret Cunningham; Kunwarjit Singh Sangla; Petra Buttner; Jonathan Golledge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.