Literature DB >> 19302733

Interpersonal complementarity in responses to auditory hallucinations in psychosis.

Neil Thomas1, Hamish J McLeod, Chris R Brewin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Models of interpersonal relating have proposed that people are drawn to respond to others according to a principle of complementarity, whereby perceived hostility elicits reciprocal hostility and perceived dominance elicits submission. This study examined interpersonal appraisals and responses to auditory hallucinations, to determine whether this principle predicts how patients respond to hallucinated voices. DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-five participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder rated their internal 'relationship' with their auditory verbal hallucinations using the Structural Analysis of Social Behaviour, in addition to completing measures of voice-related distress and depression.
RESULTS: Participants were able to ascribe almost the full range of interpersonal relating behaviours to their voices reliably, with some notable exceptions for voices' 'responses' to being directly addressed. Appraisals of voice hostility very strongly predicted reciprocal hostile responses, but perceptions of voice control were only weakly associated with submission to voices. Perceived voice hostility was also associated with voice-related distress and perceived voice control was associated with depression.
CONCLUSIONS: Individual differences in responses to auditory hallucinations appear to reflect normal interpersonal responses to appraisals of voice hostility and affiliation. However, voice hearers do not readily submit to voice control and other factors may be of importance in determining this response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19302733     DOI: 10.1348/014466509X411937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0144-6657


  4 in total

1.  Establishing the "Fit" between the Patient and the Therapy: The Role of Patient Gender in Selecting Psychological Therapy for Distressing Voices.

Authors:  Mark Hayward; Luke Slater; Katherine Berry; Salvador Perona-Garcelán
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31

2.  The Beliefs about Voices Questionnaire - Revised: A factor structure from 450 participants.

Authors:  Clara Strauss; Kenneth Hugdahl; Flavie Waters; Mark Hayward; Josef J Bless; Liv E Falkenberg; Bodil Kråkvik; Arve Egil Asbjørnsen; Erik Johnsen; Igne Sinkeviciute; Rune A Kroken; Else-Marie Løberg; Neil Thomas
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  Insidious: The relationship patients have with their eating disorders and its impact on symptoms, duration of illness, and self-image.

Authors:  Emma Forsén Mantilla; David Clinton; Andreas Birgegård
Journal:  Psychol Psychother       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 3.915

4.  Better than mermaids and stray dogs? Subtyping auditory verbal hallucinations and its implications for research and practice.

Authors:  Simon McCarthy-Jones; Neil Thomas; Clara Strauss; Guy Dodgson; Nev Jones; Angela Woods; Chris R Brewin; Mark Hayward; Massoud Stephane; Jack Barton; David Kingdon; Iris E Sommer
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 9.306

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.