Literature DB >> 19302330

Influence of lyophilization, fluidized bed drying, addition of protectants, and storage on the viability of lactic acid bacteria.

S Strasser1, M Neureiter, M Geppl, R Braun, H Danner.   

Abstract

AIMS: The present study focuses on the impact of two different drying technologies and the influence of protectants on process survival and storage stability of the two lactic acid bacterial strains Enterococcus faecium and Lactobacillus plantarum. METHODS AND
RESULTS: After incubation with the protectants glucose, sucrose, trehalose, and maltodextrin the concentrated bacterial suspensions were subjected to fluidized bed drying and lyophilization and subsequently stored at 4, 22, and 35 degrees C for half a year. Lactobacillus plantarum turned out to be more sensitive to both drying methods than Ent. faecium. Without the addition of a protectant cells of both strains suffered higher losses during fluidized bed drying. Elevated storage temperatures correlate with a higher decline of viable bacterial cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Although survival rates varied between the strains, the nonreducing disaccharides revealed overall best protection for both investigated lactic acid bacteria during processing and storage. The addition of protective carbohydrates can prevent the decline in viability during fluidized bed drying. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The influence of protectants proved to be species specific and therefore needs to be determined on a case-to-case basis. Survival rates, duration, and energy consumption appear to be the crucial parameters to evaluate the economy of production processes for industrial starter cultures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19302330     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04192.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  12 in total

Review 1.  Anhydrobiosis in bacteria: from physiology to applications.

Authors:  Armando Hernández García
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 2.  Insights on the Critical Parameters Affecting the Probiotic Viability During Stabilization Process and Formulation Development.

Authors:  Sharda Gurram; Durgesh K Jha; Devanshi S Shah; Madhuri M Kshirsagar; Purnima D Amin
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 3.  Desiccation-induced cell damage in bacteria and the relevance for inoculant production.

Authors:  Vincent Robert Guy Greffe; Jan Michiels
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Polymer and Crosslinker Content Influences Performance of Encapsulated Live Biotherapeutic Products.

Authors:  Kunyu Qiu; Yirui Huang; Aaron C Anselmo
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.321

5.  Microencapsulation by spray drying of coffee epiphytic yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae CCMA 0543 and Torulaspora delbrueckii CCMA 0684.

Authors:  Pâmela Mynsen Machado Martins; Nádia Nara Batista; Líbia Diniz Santos; Disney Ribeiro Dias; Rosane Freitas Schwan
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 6.  Emerging Technologies and Coating Materials for Improved Probiotication in Food Products: a Review.

Authors:  Sourav Misra; Pooja Pandey; Chandrakant Genu Dalbhagat; Hari Niwas Mishra
Journal:  Food Bioproc Tech       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 5.581

Review 7.  Maintenance and assessment of cell viability in formulation of non-sporulating bacterial inoculants.

Authors:  Teresa Berninger; Óscar González López; Ana Bejarano; Claudia Preininger; Angela Sessitsch
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 5.813

8.  Planktonic and Sessile Artificial Colonic Microbiota Harbor Distinct Composition and Reestablish Differently upon Frozen and Freeze-Dried Long-Term Storage.

Authors:  Lea Bircher; Clarissa Schwab; Annelies Geirnaert; Anna Greppi; Christophe Lacroix
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 6.496

9.  Isolation and probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria from swine feces for feed additive composition.

Authors:  Katarzyna Marchwińska; Daniela Gwiazdowska
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.552

10.  Effect of Fluidized Bed Drying, Matrix Constituents and Structure on the Viability of Probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei ATCC 55544 during Storage at 4 °C, 25 °C and 37 °C.

Authors:  Devastotra Poddar; Jon Palmer; Shantanu Das; Manju Gaare; Arup Nag; Harjinder Singh
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.