UNLABELLED: BACKGROUNDS AND METHODS: A higher degree of clinical efficacy with olmesartan compared with other angiotensin receptor blockers, has been reported by several sources. In this study of 31 examples of cases of essential hypertension, Holter electrocardiogram, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements were performed before and after substituting olmesartan 20 mg for candesartan 8 mg antihypertensive drug therapy. RESULTS: Following the therapeutic change, daily average systolic and diastolic blood pressures were decreased by 6.7 +/- 9.3 mmHg and 3.6 +/- 8.3 mmHg, respectively, with olmesartan 20 mg; PWV was also significantly decreased. Holter electrocardiogram heart rate variability spectral analysis demonstrated that none of the very low frequency (VLF), high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF)/HF components were significantly altered. However, a significant correlation was observed between the LF/HF component and blood pressure difference, when blood pressure and heart rate variability components in each individual case were studied. CONCLUSION: This study shows that olmesartan has a stronger antihypertensive effect in comparison to candesartan, and does not generate reflex sympathoexcitatory activity.
UNLABELLED: BACKGROUNDS AND METHODS: A higher degree of clinical efficacy with olmesartan compared with other angiotensin receptor blockers, has been reported by several sources. In this study of 31 examples of cases of essential hypertension, Holter electrocardiogram, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements were performed before and after substituting olmesartan 20 mg for candesartan 8 mg antihypertensive drug therapy. RESULTS: Following the therapeutic change, daily average systolic and diastolic blood pressures were decreased by 6.7 +/- 9.3 mmHg and 3.6 +/- 8.3 mmHg, respectively, with olmesartan 20 mg; PWV was also significantly decreased. Holter electrocardiogram heart rate variability spectral analysis demonstrated that none of the very low frequency (VLF), high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF)/HF components were significantly altered. However, a significant correlation was observed between the LF/HF component and blood pressure difference, when blood pressure and heart rate variability components in each individual case were studied. CONCLUSION: This study shows that olmesartan has a stronger antihypertensive effect in comparison to candesartan, and does not generate reflex sympathoexcitatory activity.
Authors: Marc A Pfeffer; Karl Swedberg; Christopher B Granger; Peter Held; John J V McMurray; Eric L Michelson; Bertil Olofsson; Jan Ostergren; Salim Yusuf; Stuart Pocock Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-09-06 Impact factor: 79.321