Literature DB >> 19301281

The impact of dietary organic and transgenic soy on the reproductive system of female adult rat.

Flávia Bittencourt Brasil1, Lavínia Leal Soares, Tatiane Silva Faria, Gilson Telles Boaventura, Francisco José Barcellos Sampaio, Cristiane Fonte Ramos.   

Abstract

The goal of this article was to compare the effects of a prolonged use of organic and transgenic soy on the lipid profile and ovary and uterus morphology. Wistar rats were fed three different diets from weaning until sacrifice at 15 months of age. The three diets were: casein-based diet control group (CG), organic soy-based diet group (OSG), or transgenic soy-based diet group (GMSG). There were no differences in food consumption or in the diet isoflavone components among the groups. Compared with the CG diet, both the OSG and GMSG diets were associated with significant reductions in body weight, serum triglycerides, and cholesterol (P < 0.05) (CG = 406 +/- 23.1; 104.3 +/- 13.2; 119.9 +/- 7.3 GMSG = 368 +/- 17.6; 60.3 +/- 4.6; 83.3 +/- 5.7 OSG = 389 +/- 23.5; 72.3 +/- 12.5; 95.5 +/- 8.0, respectively). The volume density of endometrial glandular epithelium was greater in the GMSG group (29.5 +/- 7.17, P < 0.001) when compared with the CG (18.5 +/- 7.4) and OSG (20.3 +/- 10.6) groups. The length density of endometrial glandular epithelium was shorter in both GMSG (567.6 +/- 41.1) and OSG (514.8 +/- 144.5) diets compared with the CG (P < 0.05) diet. GMSG also resulted in reduced follicle number and increased corpus luteum number compared to the OSG or CG diets (P < 0.05). In summary, both GMSG and OSG diets resulted in decreased body weight and lower serum triglyceride and cholesterol levels, and alterations in uterine and ovarian morphology were also observed. The prolonged use of soy-based diets and their relation to reproductive health warrants further investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19301281     DOI: 10.1002/ar.20878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  2 in total

1.  How safe does transgenic food need to be?

Authors:  Laura DeFrancesco
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Characterization of scientific studies usually cited as evidence of adverse effects of GM food/feed.

Authors:  Miguel A Sánchez; Wayne A Parrott
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 9.803

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.