Literature DB >> 19300968

What can we learn from failed clinical trials in multiple sclerosis?

Tjalf Ziemssen1.   

Abstract

The list of failed trials with ineffective or toxic drugs, despite encouraging data from research, is growing. Therapeutic trials in multiple sclerosis (MS) may be particularly vulnerable to fail because the pathogenesis of this disease is still not understood. Thus theoretically promising agents may paradoxically increase disease activity or be associated with unforeseen adverse effects. Short-term favourable trends may reverse with a prolonged follow-up. Antigen-specific therapies can stimulate in vivo rather than to inhibit encephalitogenic cells. In addition to the negative message of failed trials itself, they can promote new hypotheses about disease pathophysiology. Failed trials can provide valuable information how studies and outcome measures should be designed for future trials. So it is important that negative trials are published and available for the MS community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19300968     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-008-6018-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  25 in total

1.  Needed in MS: evidence, not EVIDENCE.

Authors:  Karl Kieburtz; Michael McDermott
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2002-11-26       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Campath-1H treatment of multiple sclerosis: lessons from the bedside for the bench.

Authors:  Alasdair Coles; Jackie Deans; Alastair Compston
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 3.  Modulating processes within the central nervous system is central to therapeutic control of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Tjalf Ziemssen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Intravenous immunoglobulin in MS: promise or failure?

Authors:  Franz Fazekas; Siegrid Strasser-Fuchs; Otto R Hommes
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.181

5.  Lessons from the past: failed MS trials.

Authors:  A Chan; R Gold
Journal:  Int MS J       Date:  2007-03

6.  Linomide in relapsing and secondary progressive MS: part II: MRI results. MRI Analysis Center of the University of Texas-Houston, Health Science Center, and the North American Linomide Investigators.

Authors:  J S Wolinsky; P A Narayana; J H Noseworthy; F D Lublin; J N Whitaker; A Linde; P Gjörstrup; H C Sullivan
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  Tumor necrosis factor blockade in actively induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis prevents clinical disease despite activated T cell infiltration to the central nervous system.

Authors:  H Körner; F A Lemckert; G Chaudhri; S Etteldorf; J D Sedgwick
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 8.  History of modern multiple sclerosis therapy.

Authors:  Fred Lublin
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Glatiramer acetate in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: results of a multinational, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Jerry S Wolinsky; Ponnada A Narayana; Paul O'Connor; Patricia K Coyle; Corey Ford; Kenneth Johnson; Aaron Miller; Lillian Pardo; Shaul Kadosh; David Ladkani
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  The Mayo Clinic-Canadian Cooperative trial of sulfasalazine in active multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  J H Noseworthy; P O'Brien; B J Erickson; D Lee; D Sneve; G C Ebers; G P Rice; A Auty; W J Hader; A Kirk; P Duquette; J Carter; G Francis; L Metz; E Shuster
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  What Have Failed, Interrupted, and Withdrawn Antibody Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis Taught Us?

Authors:  Julia Krämer; Heinz Wiendl
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.088

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.