Literature DB >> 19300312

Cost savings attributable to reductions in intensive care unit length of stay for mechanically ventilated patients.

Jeremy M Kahn1, Gordon D Rubenfeld, Jeffery Rohrbach, Barry D Fuchs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the actual cost savings that could be achieved through reductions in intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation by determining the short-run marginal variable cost of an ICU and ventilator day. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study in a university-affiliated teaching hospital.
SUBJECTS: All patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the ICU for more than 48 hours (n = 1778) from July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006. MEASURES: The hospital's administrative and cost databases were used to determine total costs, variable costs, and direct-variable costs for each patient on each individual ICU and hospital day.
RESULTS: Direct-variable costs comprised 19.3% of total ICU costs and 18.4% of total hospital costs. Marginal direct-variable costs (the cost of each additional ICU day) were small compared with the average daily total cost ($649 to $839 vs. $1751, in US dollars). In survivors with ICU lengths of stay more than 3 days, the mean direct-variable cost of the last ICU day was $397, while the mean direct-variable cost of the first ward day was $279, for a mean cost difference of $118 (95% CI, $21-$190). Reducing ICU and hospital length of stay by 1 day in all survivors with ICU lengths of stay more than 3 days would result in an immediate cost savings of only 0.2% of all hospital expenditures for these patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Marginal variable ICU costs are relatively small compared with average total costs and are only slightly greater than the cost of a ward day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19300312     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817d9342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  51 in total

1.  Should cost considerations be included in medical decisions? No.

Authors:  Bin Du; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Understanding Costs When Seeking Value in Critical Care.

Authors:  Meeta Prasad Kerlin; Colin R Cooke
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-12

3.  Should dexmedetomidine replace benzodiazepines as the preferred sedative, as suggested by new guidelines from the society for critical care medicine?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2013-11

4.  [Cross sectional study of structural quality of German intensive care units. A reevaluation of the DIVI register].

Authors:  C Fölsch; N Kofahl; C Waydhas; R Stiletto
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 0.840

5.  Health care utilization and the cost of posttraumatic acute respiratory distress syndrome care.

Authors:  Anamaria J Robles; Lucy Z Kornblith; Carolyn M Hendrickson; Benjamin M Howard; Amanda S Conroy; Farzad Moazed; Carolyn S Calfee; Mitchell J Cohen; Rachael A Callcut
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.313

6.  Impact of nurse-led remote screening and prompting for evidence-based practices in the ICU*.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Scott R Gunn; Holly L Lorenz; Jeffrey Alvarez; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Transfer Delays From the Neurologic Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nicholas A Morris; Ayush Batra; Alessandro Biffi; Adam B Cohen
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2015-09-08

Review 8.  Using existing data to address important clinical questions in critical care.

Authors:  Colin R Cooke; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Intensive Care Medicine in 2050: cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky; Andreas Valentin; Gordon Rubenfeld
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  Using Incentives to Improve Resource Utilization: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation of an ICU Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  David J Murphy; Peter F Lyu; Sara R Gregg; Greg S Martin; Jason M Hockenberry; Craig M Coopersmith; Michael Sterling; Timothy G Buchman; Jonathan Sevransky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.