Literature DB >> 19300259

Immune responses to alpha1,3 galactosyltransferase knockout pigs.

Gisella Puga Yung1, Mårten K J Schneider, Jörg D Seebach.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the current knowledge of the immune response generated against xenografts stemming from alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout (GalT-KO) pigs. In particular, we will address the nature of potentially remaining Gal epitopes, the role of non-Gal xenoantigens, and the cellular response directed against GalT-KO tissues. RECENT
FINDINGS: New findings support the view that porcine cells do not express isoglobotrihexosylceramide 3, and GalT-KO pigs, if at all, express negligible levels of Gal. The anti-non-Gal antibody response to GalT-KO cells allowed the identification of several potentially relevant porcine xenoantigens, mainly carbohydrates. Coculture of wildtype pig aortic endothelial cells but not of GalT-KO pig aortic endothelial cells with whole human blood induces the secretion of porcine and human cytokines and the upregulation of E-selectin; in contrast, the transmigration of human leukocytes across porcine endothelium is not regulated by Gal.
SUMMARY: New immunological problems are arising after the elimination of Gal by the generation of GalT-KO pigs; these include non-Gal antibodies and the identification of their elusive antigens, as well as cellular components of the immune system, including neutrophils, macrophages, natural killer cells, and T cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19300259     DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0b013e328329250d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant        ISSN: 1087-2418            Impact factor:   2.640


  7 in total

1.  Complete absence of the αGal xenoantigen and isoglobotrihexosylceramide in α1,3galactosyltransferase knock-out pigs.

Authors:  Gisella L Puga Yung; Yunsen Li; Lubor Borsig; Anne-Laure Millard; Maria B Karpova; Dapeng Zhou; Jörg D Seebach
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.907

Review 2.  Immunobiology of liver xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Burcin Ekser; Christopher Burlak; Joshua P Waldman; Andrew J Lutz; Leela L Paris; Massimiliano Veroux; Simon C Robson; Michael A Rees; David Ayares; Bruno Gridelli; A Joseph Tector; David Kc Cooper
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.473

Review 3.  Current status of xenotransplantation and prospects for clinical application.

Authors:  Richard N Pierson; Anthony Dorling; David Ayares; Michael A Rees; Jörg D Seebach; Jay A Fishman; Bernhard J Hering; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.907

4.  Comparison of Bone Regeneration between Porcine-Derived and Bovine-Derived Xenografts in Rat Calvarial Defects: A Non-Inferiority Study.

Authors:  Eun-Bin Bae; Ha-Jin Kim; Jong-Ju Ahn; Hyun-Young Bae; Hyung-Joon Kim; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 5.  Characteristics of α-Gal epitope, anti-Gal antibody, α1,3 galactosyltransferase and its clinical exploitation (Review).

Authors:  Guoli Huai; Ping Qi; Hongji Yang; Yi Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 6.  The Role of NK Cells in Pig-to-Human Xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Gisella Puga Yung; Mårten K J Schneider; Jörg D Seebach
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 4.818

7.  Possible Link Between the ABO Blood Group of Bioprosthesis Recipients and Specific Types of Structural Degeneration.

Authors:  Olivier Schussler; Nermine Lila; Juan Grau; Marc Ruel; Yves Lecarpentier; Alain Carpentier
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.