OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) and preoperative Functional Health Status (FHS) variables on risk-adjusted estimates of surgical quality and to assess whether classifications are inflated at some hospitals. BACKGROUND: ASA and FHS are influential in risk-adjusted comparisons of surgical quality. However, because ASA and FHS are subjective they can be inflated, making patients appear more ill than they actually are, and crediting hospitals for a sicker patient population. METHODS: We identified 28,751 colorectal surgery patients at 170 hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) during 2006 to 2007. Logistic regression models were developed for morbidity and mortality with and without inclusion of ASA and FHS. Hospital quality rankings from the different models were compared. RESULTS: Morbidity and mortality rates were 24.3% and 3.9%, respectively. Percents of patients in ASA classes I through V were 3.3%, 46.4%, 41.5%,8.3%, and 0.7% and that were independent or partially or totally dependent were 89.2%, 7.2%, and 3.6%, respectively. Models that included ASA and FHS exhibited slightly better fit (Hosmer-Lemshow statistic) and discrimination(c-statistic) than models without both these variables, though magnitudes of differences were consistent with chance. There was inconsistent evidence for improper assignment of ASA and FHS. CONCLUSIONS: The small improvements in model quality when both ASA and FHS are present versus absent, suggest that they make a unique contribution to assessing severity of preoperative risk. With little indication that these subjective variables are subject to an important level of institutional bias, it is appropriate that they be used to assess risk-adjusted surgical quality. Periodic monitoring for inappropriate inflation of ASA status is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) and preoperative Functional Health Status (FHS) variables on risk-adjusted estimates of surgical quality and to assess whether classifications are inflated at some hospitals. BACKGROUND:ASA and FHS are influential in risk-adjusted comparisons of surgical quality. However, because ASA and FHS are subjective they can be inflated, making patients appear more ill than they actually are, and crediting hospitals for a sicker patient population. METHODS: We identified 28,751 colorectal surgery patients at 170 hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) during 2006 to 2007. Logistic regression models were developed for morbidity and mortality with and without inclusion of ASA and FHS. Hospital quality rankings from the different models were compared. RESULTS: Morbidity and mortality rates were 24.3% and 3.9%, respectively. Percents of patients in ASA classes I through V were 3.3%, 46.4%, 41.5%,8.3%, and 0.7% and that were independent or partially or totally dependent were 89.2%, 7.2%, and 3.6%, respectively. Models that included ASA and FHS exhibited slightly better fit (Hosmer-Lemshow statistic) and discrimination(c-statistic) than models without both these variables, though magnitudes of differences were consistent with chance. There was inconsistent evidence for improper assignment of ASA and FHS. CONCLUSIONS: The small improvements in model quality when both ASA and FHS are present versus absent, suggest that they make a unique contribution to assessing severity of preoperative risk. With little indication that these subjective variables are subject to an important level of institutional bias, it is appropriate that they be used to assess risk-adjusted surgical quality. Periodic monitoring for inappropriate inflation of ASA status is warranted.
Authors: Richard T Spence; David C Chang; Haytham M A Kaafarani; Eugenio Panieri; Geoffrey A Anderson; Matthew M Hutter Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Richard T Spence; David C Chang; Kathryn Chu; Eugenio Panieri; Jessica L Mueller; Matthew M Hutter Journal: World J Surg Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: J Brian Szender; Peter J Frederick; Kevin H Eng; Stacey N Akers; Shashikant B Lele; Kunle Odunsi Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Jamie E Anderson; John Rose; Abraham Noorbakhsh; Mark A Talamini; Samuel R G Finlayson; Stephen W Bickler; David C Chang Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Amir Fathi; Kathleen K Christians; Ben George; Paul S Ritch; Beth A Erickson; Parag Tolat; Fabian M Johnston; Douglas B Evans; Susan Tsai Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2015-08
Authors: John E Scarborough; Kyla M Bennett; Brian R Englum; Theodore N Pappas; Sandhya A Lagoo-Deenadayalan Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 12.969