Literature DB >> 19299618

Genetic incompatibility drives sex allocation and maternal investment in a polymorphic finch.

Sarah R Pryke1, Simon C Griffith.   

Abstract

Genetic compatibility may drive individual mate choice decisions because of predictable fitness effects associated with breeding with incompatible partners. In Gouldian finches (Erythrura gouldiae), females paired with genetically incompatible males of alternative color morphs overproduce sons, presumably to reduce investment in inviable daughters. We also observed a reduced overall investment in clutch size, egg size, and care to offspring resulting from incompatible matings. Within-female experimental pairings demonstrate that female birds have the ability to adaptively adjust the sex of their eggs and allocate resources on the basis of partner quality. Female Gouldian finches thus make cumulative strategic allocation decisions to minimize the costs of poor-quality pairings when faced with a genetically incompatible partner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19299618     DOI: 10.1126/science.1168928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  22 in total

1.  Kin recognition and adjustment of reproductive effort in zebra finches.

Authors:  Aneta Arct; Joanna Rutkowska; Rafal Martyka; Szymon M Drobniak; Mariusz Cichon
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  When mothers make sons sexy: maternal effects contribute to the increased sexual attractiveness of extra-pair offspring.

Authors:  Barbara Tschirren; Erik Postma; Alison N Rutstein; Simon C Griffith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Paternally induced transgenerational environmental reprogramming of metabolic gene expression in mammals.

Authors:  Benjamin R Carone; Lucas Fauquier; Naomi Habib; Jeremy M Shea; Caroline E Hart; Ruowang Li; Christoph Bock; Chengjian Li; Hongcang Gu; Phillip D Zamore; Alexander Meissner; Zhiping Weng; Hans A Hofmann; Nir Friedman; Oliver J Rando
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Constrained mate choice in social monogamy and the stress of having an unattractive partner.

Authors:  Simon C Griffith; Sarah R Pryke; William A Buttemer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  I'm eating for two: parental dietary effects on offspring metabolism.

Authors:  Oliver J Rando; Rebecca A Simmons
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Daddy issues: paternal effects on phenotype.

Authors:  Oliver J Rando
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 7.  Polyandry and alternative mating tactics.

Authors:  Bryan D Neff; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Mothers adjust offspring sex to match the quality of the rearing environment.

Authors:  Sarah R Pryke; Lee A Rollins
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  A non-coding region near Follistatin controls head colour polymorphism in the Gouldian finch.

Authors:  Matthew B Toomey; Cristiana I Marques; Pedro Andrade; Pedro M Araújo; Stephen Sabatino; Małgorzata A Gazda; Sandra Afonso; Ricardo J Lopes; Joseph C Corbo; Miguel Carneiro
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Increased extra-pair paternity in broods of aging males and enhanced recruitment of extra-pair young in a migratory bird.

Authors:  E Keith Bowers; Anna M Forsman; Brian S Masters; Bonnie G P Johnson; L Scott Johnson; Scott K Sakaluk; Charles F Thompson
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.