Literature DB >> 19299428

Blood pressure responder rates versus goal rates: which metric matters?

Jan Basile1.   

Abstract

Reducing blood pressure (BP) to guideline-recommended goals associated with reductions in cardiovascular risk is central to effective hypertension management. In addition to measuring BP reduction, clinical trials of antihypertensive agents should assess the percentage of patients responding to treatment. The Food and Drug Administration's defined rate of response required for drug approval is a reduction in diastolic BP (DBP) to <90 mmHg and/or a DBP reduction of > or = 10 mmHg. Consequently, some patients may be counted as responders even if they have not reached DBP <90 mmHg. An antihypertensive agent's effectiveness may be better assessed by the proportion of patients who achieve recommended BP goals. This article analyzes the frequency of response rates versus goal rates as endpoints in randomized trials since January 2001. Data showed that goal rates, especially combined systolic BP (SBP)/DBP goal rates, are consistently lower than response rates in studies evaluating both endpoints. Goal rates incorporating both SBP and DBP, or having a focus on SBP for individuals >50 years of age, provide the most clinically relevant information and are a more clinically relevant metric of an agent's ability to reduce BP than DBP alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19299428     DOI: 10.1177/1753944708101552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 1753-9447


  4 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of treatment of hypertensive patients with fixed combination perindopril/indapamide up to 10/2.5 mg: results of the FALCO FORTE programme.

Authors:  Daniel Pella
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2011-09-01

2.  Race-Specific Comparisons of Antihypertensive and Metabolic Effects of Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone.

Authors:  Lakshmi Manasa S Chekka; Arlene B Chapman; John G Gums; Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff; Julie A Johnson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.928

3.  The COSEHC™ Global Vascular Risk Management quality improvement program: first follow-up report.

Authors:  Carlos M Ferrario; Janae Joyner; Chris Colby; Alex Exuzides; Michael Moore; Debra Simmons; William Bestermann; Feride Frech-Tamas
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2013-07-22

4.  Safety and efficacy of fimasartan in patients with arterial hypertension (Safe-KanArb study): an open-label observational study.

Authors:  Jeong Bae Park; Ki-Chul Sung; Seok-Min Kang; Eun Joo Cho
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.571

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.