Literature DB >> 19299072

Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy: a multicenter analysis in Japan.

Osamu Kamihira1, Ryohei Hattori, Akito Yamaguchi, Gen Kawa, Osamu Ogawa, Tomonori Habuchi, Akihiro Kawauchi, Jiro Uozumi, Shigeaki Yokoi, Masao Tsujihata, Yoshihiro Hasui, Keiko Miyakoda, Harue Tada, Yoshinari Ono, Seiji Naito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNUx) is prevalent in Japan and throughout the world, but long-term outcome data remain limited.
OBJECTIVE: To understand the present state of LNUx in Japan, we conducted a multicenter analysis of clinical outcome and long-term cancer control for patients who underwent the procedure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between January 1995 and December 2005, 1003 patients with urothelial cancer in the upper urinary tract were treated with LNUx at 51 institutions in Japan, and patient data were collected retrospectively. MEASUREMENTS: Patient profiles were gathered and analyzed for survival, intravesical recurrence, and risk factors influencing them. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median operative time was 320 min. Median bleeding volume was 232 ml. Complications occurred in 93 cases (9.3%) intraoperatively and in 107 cases (10.7%) postoperatively. Overall survival rate was 70% at 5 yr. Grade 3, pT3 or pT4, multifocal tumor, lymph-node metastasis, and previous or coexistent bladder tumor were independent risk factors for overall survival. Intravesical recurrence rate was 43% at 5 yr. Intravesical recurrence occurred more frequently in males, in patients with multifocal tumors, in patients with previous or coexistent bladder tumors, and in patients who underwent the hand-assisted approach.
CONCLUSIONS: Our report represents the largest multicenter analysis of LNUx reported to date. Male sex and the use of the hand-assisted approach were shown for the first time to be risk factors for recurrence-free survival and intravesical recurrence. To further analyze the effectiveness of LNUx, a long-term outcome comparison with risk stratification must be made between LNUx and open nephroureterectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19299072     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  25 in total

1.  Comparison between laparoscopic and open radical nephroureterectomy in a contemporary group of patients: are recurrence and disease-specific survival associated with surgical technique?

Authors:  Ricardo L Favaretto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Daher C Chade; Guilherme Godoy; Matthew Kaag; Angel M Cronin; Bernard H Bochner; Jonathan Coleman; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Canadian guidelines for postoperative surveillance of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Anil Kapoor; Christopher B Allard; Peter Black; Wassim Kassouf; Christopher Morash; Ricardo Rendon
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

Review 4.  Laparascopic nephrectomy: different techniques and approaches.

Authors:  Tania González León
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Prognostic factors for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas F Chromecki; Karim Bensalah; Mesut Remzi; Grégory Verhoest; Eugene K Cha; Douglas S Scherr; Giacomo Novara; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Specific body mass index cut-off value in relation to survival of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas.

Authors:  Teruo Inamoto; Kazumasa Komura; Toshikazu Watsuji; Haruhito Azuma
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 7.  Oncologic outcomes obtained after laparoscopic, robotic and/or single port nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract tumours.

Authors:  Maria J Ribal; J Huguet; A Alcaraz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Current Status of Lymphadenectomy During Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer-Yes, No or Maybe?

Authors:  Ashwin Sunil Tamhankar; Saurabh Ramesh Patil; Puneet Ahluwalia; Gagan Gautam
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-13

9.  The method of bladder cuff excision during laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy does not affect oncologic outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Christopher B Allard; Abdulaziz Alamri; Shawn Dason; Farough Farrokhyar; Edward D Matsumoto; Anil Kapoor
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-07-29       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse survival outcomes than open radical nephroureterectomy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyung Suk Kim; Ja Hyeon Ku; Chang Wook Jeong; Cheol Kwak; Hyeon Hoe Kim
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.