Literature DB >> 19298638

Judging respiratory specimen acceptability for AFB microscopy: visual vs. microscopic screening.

Mishal S Khan1, Osman Dar, Sabira Tahseen, Peter Godfrey-Faussett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether visual assessment or microscopic grading of the cellular composition of specimens is a better strategy to screen specimen quality for tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis.
METHODS: About 2643 specimens were collected from TB suspects at the Federal TB centre in Pakistan. Specimens were classified as sputum or saliva visually and microscopically using the criteria proposed by McCarter and Robinson, Van Scoy, Geckler et al., Murray and Washington and Bartlett. The acid-fast bacilli (AFB)-positivity of specimens was also assessed. Results Despite being the least 'technical' and time consuming, visual assessment rejected the lowest proportion of AFB-positive specimens (0.3%). Most microscopic grading criteria, particularly those that considered the squamous epithelial cell count, rejected a large proportion of specimens (30-66%), of which a sizeable fraction contained AFB (6-12%).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that visual assessment by trained technicians is more effective and suitable than microscopic grading for screening specimens for TB diagnosis. TB control resources could be better allocated to optimizing visual screening than investing in more 'strict' microscopic grading tools.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19298638     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02260.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trop Med Int Health        ISSN: 1360-2276            Impact factor:   2.622


  4 in total

1.  Gastric specimens for diagnosing tuberculosis in adults unable to expectorate in Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Authors:  W Aslam; S Tahseen; C Schomotzer; A Hussain; F Khanzada; M Ul Haq; N Mahmood; R Fatima; E Qadeer; E Heldal
Journal:  Public Health Action       Date:  2017-06-21

2.  Direct microscopy versus sputum cytology analysis and bleach sedimentation for diagnosis of tuberculosis: a prospective diagnostic study.

Authors:  Pamela Hepple; Pascal Nguele; Jane Greig; Maryline Bonnet; Vinciane Sizaire
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 3.  Practice Guidelines for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Betty A Forbes; Geraldine S Hall; Melissa B Miller; Susan M Novak; Marie-Claire Rowlinson; Max Salfinger; Akos Somoskövi; David M Warshauer; Michael L Wilson
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Impact of sputum gross appearance and volume on smear positivity of pulmonary tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Soon Ho Yoon; Nyoung Keun Lee; Jae Joon Yim
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.090

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.