Literature DB >> 19298233

Dextropropoxyphene withdrawal from a French university hospital: impact on analgesic drug consumption.

Sabine Gaubert1, Martine Vié, Christine Damase-Michel, Atul Pathak, Jean-Louis Montastruc.   

Abstract

Dextropropoxyphene is a weak opioid analgesic, widely used as a step 2 analgesic (according to WHO classification) in combination with peripheral analgesics, mainly paracetamol. Recent data have underlined its poor analgesic efficacy (in comparison with paracetamol), risks of serious adverse drug reactions (i.e. hepatic reactions, hallucinations, abuse, withdrawal symptoms, hypoglycaemia), possible lethality after overdose, its risk of accumulation in patients with renal failure or in elderly people and some pharmacokinetic insufficiencies (i.e. different half-lives for dextropropoxyphene and paracetamol). Taking into account these data, the drug committee of the Toulouse University Hospital (France) decided to withdraw dextropropoxyphene from the hospital formulary since 1 June 2005. The aim of our study was to investigate the consequences of this withdrawal by comparing use of analgesic drugs in Toulouse University Hospital before (2004) and after (2006) dextropropoxyphene withdrawal (using defined daily dose for 1000 hospitalization-days as the unit measure). Before withdrawal, dextropropoxyphene (in combination with paracetamol) was the second most used analgesic drug after paracetamol alone. After dextropropoxyphene withdrawal, total consumption of analgesic drugs decreased by 4.6% (2006 vs. 2004). There was a 28% decrease in consumption of step 2 analgesics [with an increase in oral tramadol and a slight decrease in codeine (in combination with paracetamol)]. During the same period, step 1 analgesic consumption increased by 11% (mainly paracetamol) and that of step 3 analgesics slightly decreased (-8%). These results show that dextropropoxyphene withdrawal was not associated with a marked switch in prescriptions towards other analgesic drugs. This paper underlines the interest of a hospital-based drug committee to promote rational drug use. Finally, the present data allow us to discuss putative misuse of dextropropoxyphene.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19298233     DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2008.00661.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fundam Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0767-3981            Impact factor:   2.748


  7 in total

1.  Consequences of dextropropoxyphene market withdrawal in elderly patients with chronic pain.

Authors:  Laurent Becquemont; Tiba Delespierre; Bernard Bauduceau; Linda Benattar-Zibi; Gilles Berrut; Emmanuelle Corruble; Nicolas Danchin; Geneviève Derumeaux; Jean Doucet; Bruno Falissard; Francoise Forette; Olivier Hanon; Florence Pasquier; Michel Pinget; Rissane Ourabah; Sophie Bucher; Aida Lazkani; Celine Piedvache; Philippe Bertin
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Preventability of adverse effects of analgesics: analysis of spontaneous reports.

Authors:  Irina Cazacu; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Cristina Mogosan; Annie Fourrier-Réglat; Felicia Loghin; Françoise Haramburu
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  The fuzzy line between needs, coverage, and excess in the Mexican Formulary List: an example of qualitative market width analysis.

Authors:  Israel Rico-Alba; Albert Figueras
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Trends in analgesic consumption in France over the last 10 years and comparison of patterns across Europe.

Authors:  Karima Hider-Mlynarz; Philippe Cavalié; Patrick Maison
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Tramadol and hypoglycaemia: comparison with other step 2 analgesic drugs.

Authors:  Cindy Bourne; Aurore Gouraud; Amélie Daveluy; Aurélie Grandvuillemin; Pascal Auriche; Jacques Descotes; Thierry Vial
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Use of analgesics in France, following dextropropoxyphene withdrawal.

Authors:  E Van Ganse; M Belhassen; M Ginoux; E Chrétien; C Cornu; C Ecoffey; F Aubrun
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Perceptions of French general practitioners and patients regarding dextropropoxyphene withdrawal: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Aurélie Combier; Lucile Bon; Eric Van Ganse; Frédéric Aubrun; Laurent Letrilliart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.