Literature DB >> 19297160

The trend of pressure ulcer prevalence rates in German hospitals: results of seven cross-sectional studies.

Jan Kottner1, Doris Wilborn, Theo Dassen, Nils Lahmann.   

Abstract

Pressure ulcer prevalence rates provide useful information about the magnitude of this health problem. Only limited information on pressure ulcers in Germany was available before 2001. The purpose of this study was to compare results of seven pressure ulcer prevalence surveys which were conducted annually between 2001 and 2007 and to explore whether pressure ulcer prevalence rates decreased. The second aim was to evaluate if the measured prevalence rates of our sample could be generalised for all German hospitals. Results of seven point pressure ulcer prevalence studies conducted in 225 German hospitals were analysed. Chi-square tests, chi-square trend tests and one-way ANOVA to assess differences and trends across the years were applied. The sample was stratified according to pressure ulcer risk and speciality. Finally, study samples were compared with the potential population. In total data of 40,247 hospital patients were analysed. The overall pressure ulcer prevalence rate in German hospitals was 10.2%. Patient samples of each year were comparable regarding gender, age and pressure ulcer risk. Pressure ulcer prevalence rates decreased from 13.9% (year 2001) to 7.3% (year 2007) (p<0.001). When excluding non-blanchable erythema prevalence rates decreased from 6.4% (year 2001) to 3.9% (year 2007) (p=0.015). An explicit decrease of prevalence rates was observed on geriatric wards. Prevalence rates on neurological and intensive care units remained stable. With some limitations our study results are representative for all hospitals within Germany. It is highly probable that the decrease of prevalence rates was due to an increased awareness of the pressure ulcer problem in Germany and subsequent efforts to improve pressure ulcer prevention and treatment. The quality of clinical practice regarding pressure ulcer prevention and treatment has improved. However, pressure ulcers are still relevant and require attention. In 2007, one out of 10 hospital patients who were at pressure ulcer risk had at least one pressure related skin damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19297160     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtv.2009.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Viability        ISSN: 0965-206X            Impact factor:   2.932


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Skin diseases in geriatric patients. Epidemiologic data].

Authors:  E Makrantonaki; A I Liakou; R Eckardt; M Zens; E Steinhagen-Thiessen; C C Zouboulis
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Pressure ulcers in four Indonesian hospitals: prevalence, patient characteristics, ulcer characteristics, prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Yufitriana Amir; Christa Lohrmann; Ruud Jg Halfens; Jos Mga Schols
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Challenges in pressure ulcer prevention.

Authors:  Carol Dealey; C Tod Brindle; Joyce Black; Paulo Alves; Nick Santamaria; Evan Call; Michael Clark
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Do pressure ulcer risk assessment scales improve clinical practice?

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Katrin Balzer
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2010-07-23

5.  Dry skin and the use of leave-on products in nursing care: A prevalence study in nursing homes and hospitals.

Authors:  Anna Lechner; Nils Lahmann; Andrea Lichterfeld-Kottner; Ursula Müller-Werdan; Ulrike Blume-Peytavi; Jan Kottner
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2018-09-27

6.  A Study of the Factors Associated with Risk for Development of Pressure Ulcers: A Longitudinal Analysis.

Authors:  Elizebeth Thomas; Sudhaya Vinodkumar; Silvia Mathew; Maninder Singh Setia
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.494

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.