Literature DB >> 19296968

Pediatric urinary stone disease--does age matter?

Carmin M Kalorin1, Andrew Zabinski, Ikenna Okpareke, Mark White, Barry A Kogan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: It has been proposed that younger children are less likely to pass renal calculi spontaneously, and that children younger than 10 years are more likely to have an identifiable metabolic abnormality and subsequently a higher risk of recurrence. We report our clinical outcomes in children with urinary calculi, specifically examining these factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all pediatric patients diagnosed with renal or ureteral calculi at our institution between 2000 and 2007. Of 150 patients evaluated and treated during this period 80 (86 stones) had sufficient followup data to be included. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to age, namely 10 years or younger and older than 10 years. There were 39 patients in the younger group and 41 patients in the older group. Stone size and location, successful passage or intervention, recurrence and 24-hour urine metabolic study results were recorded.
RESULTS: Of the younger cohort stones were ureteral in 43% and renal in 57%. The opposite trend was seen in older patients, with 69% having ureteral and 31% having renal stones (p = 0.02). Mean stone size (greatest dimension) did not differ significantly between the older and younger groups (6.9 mm vs 5.5 mm, p = 0.17). Overall stone passage rate was 34% for younger and 29% for older patients (p = 0.65). No significant mean size differences in passed stones existed between the groups (3.2 mm vs 2.5 mm, p = 0.31). Overall younger vs older ureteral stone passage rate was 37% vs 41% (p = 0.58), and for renal stones it was 32% vs 0%. Stones recurred in 7 younger and 6 older patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Younger children were more likely to present with renal stones, while older children had more ureteral stones. Overall children 10 years old or younger are as likely to pass stones as older children. Renal stones are more likely to be successfully managed expectantly in younger children. Metabolic abnormalities and stone recurrences are observed at similar rates between younger and older children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19296968     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

1.  Pediatric urolithiasis: metabolic risk factors and follow-up results in a Turkish region with endemic stone disease.

Authors:  Ahmet Midhat Elmacı; Aydın Ece; Fatih Akın
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  What is the fate of insignificant residual fragment following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in pediatric patients with anomalous kidney? A comparison with normal kidney.

Authors:  Bimalesh Purkait; Rahul Janak Sinha; Ankur Bansal; Ashok Kumar Sokhal; Kawaljit Singh; Vishwajeet Singh
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  The increasing pediatric stone disease problem.

Authors:  Douglass B Clayton; John C Pope
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-02

Review 4.  Stones in special situations.

Authors:  Mordechai Duvdevani; Stavros Sfoungaristos; Karim Bensalah; Benoit Peyronnet; Amy Krambeck; Sanjay Khadji; Ahmet Muslumanuglu; David Leavitt; Jude Divers; Zeph Okeke; Arthur Smith; Janelle Fox; Michael Ost; Andreas J Gross; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Metabolic risk factors in pediatric stone formers: a report from an emerging economy.

Authors:  Kiran Imran; Mirza Naqi Zafar; Uzma Ozair; Sadia Khan; Syed Adibul Hasan Rizvi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Results of medical treatment and metabolic risk factors in children with urolithiasis.

Authors:  Metin Kaya Gürgöze; Mehmet Yusuf Sarı
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 3.714

7.  Use of medical expulsive therapy in children: An assessment of nationwide practice patterns and outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan S Ellison; Paul A Merguerian; Benjamin C Fu; Sarah K Holt; Thomas S Lendvay; John L Gore; Margarett Shnorhavorian
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 1.830

8.  Clinical course of pediatric urolithiasis: follow-up data in a long-term basis.

Authors:  Hakan Koyuncu; Faruk Yencilek; Sakip Erturhan; Bilal Eryildirım; Kemal Sarica
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Pediatric primary urolithiasis: Symptoms, medical management and prevention strategies.

Authors:  Maria Goretti Moreira Guimarães Penido; Marcelo de Sousa Tavares
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-09-06

10.  Demographic characteristics and metabolic risk factors in Croatian children with urolithiasis.

Authors:  Danko Milošević; Danica Batinić; Daniel Turudić; Danko Batinić; Marija Topalović-Grković; Ivan Pavao Gradiški
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.