Literature DB >> 19296905

Consummatory successive negative and anticipatory contrast effects in inbred Roman rats.

Ma José Gómez1, Ma Dolores Escarabajal, Lourdes de la Torre, Adolf Tobeña, Alberto Fernández-Teruel, Carmen Torres.   

Abstract

Three experiments were designed to study the performance of female inbred Roman High-(RHA-I) and Low-(RLA-I) Avoidance rats in a consummatory task in which successive negative (cSNC) and anticipatory contrast (cANC) effects were induced by changing the concentration of the sucrose solution used as reward. Both RHA-I and RLA-I rats showed a significant suppression of drinking (cSNC) when they were exposed to 32% sucrose in preshift phase and 4% in postshift phase, in comparison to RHA-I and RLA-I control groups always exposed to 4% sucrose (Experiment 1). By contrast, when the preshift-postshift reward discrepancy was reduced from 32-4 to 22-4 in Experiment 2, both strains showed a suppression of fluid intake on the first postshift trial, whereas only the more emotional RLA-I strain maintained this suppression on subsequent days. Finally, no consumption differences were observed between RHA-I and RLA-I rats exposed to brief daily access to 4% sucrose followed by access to 22% sucrose (cANC, Experiment 3). These results suggest that differences between the Roman rat strains in consummatory contrast paradigms can only be observed when the sucrose solution manipulation implies an incentive loss-attenuated emotional situation, but not when it occurs in an anticipatory manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19296905     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  6 in total

1.  Similarities and differences between "proactive" and "passive" stress-coping rats in responses to sucrose, NaCl, citric acid, and quinine.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Gretha J Boersma; Heather Oros; Pique Choi; Kellie L Tamashiro; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Identifying profiles of recovery from reward devaluation in rats.

Authors:  Santiago Papini; Isaac R Galatzer-Levy; Mauricio R Papini
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Prepulse inhibition predicts spatial working memory performance in the inbred Roman high- and low-avoidance rats and in genetically heterogeneous NIH-HS rats: relevance for studying pre-attentive and cognitive anomalies in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ignasi Oliveras; Cristóbal Río-Álamos; Toni Cañete; Gloria Blázquez; Esther Martínez-Membrives; Osvaldo Giorgi; Maria G Corda; Adolf Tobeña; Alberto Fernández-Teruel
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Behavioural responses to unexpected changes in reward quality.

Authors:  Stefanie Riemer; Hannah Thompson; Oliver H P Burman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Long-term changes in cognitive bias and coping response as a result of chronic unpredictable stress during adolescence.

Authors:  Lauren E Chaby; Sonia A Cavigelli; Amanda White; Kayllie Wang; Victoria A Braithwaite
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  A reappraisal of successive negative contrast in two populations of domestic dogs.

Authors:  Stefanie Riemer; Sarah L H Ellis; Sian Ryan; Hannah Thompson; Oliver H P Burman
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.084

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.