A boost in microRNAs shapes up the neuron.

Neuronal activity regulates dendritic and synaptic development through both a global response in the form of transcription and a local control in the form of synaptic translation. Understanding how transcription and translation might be linked would provide new insight into signals connecting the nucleus to the synapse. Reported in this issue of

MicroRNAs have emerged as a powerful class of conserved noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally and have important functions in numerous aspects of development. Numerous miRNAs are expressed at high levels in the nervous system; a few of these have been localized to dendrites (Kye ), where they are believed to regulate neural development and plasticity. Impaired expression of miRNAs is implicated in several neurological diseases. MicroRNAs are encoded by genes in the form of large transcripts that undergo processing by Drosha and Dicer, two specific RNases in the nucleus and cytoplasm, respectively. The final product is a small RNA molecule (18–22 nt), which forms an imperfect duplexe on their target mRNAs. More commonly this leads to translational inhibition of target mRNAs through the RNA-induced silencing complex (Bartel, 2004). These features enable specific miRNAs to act on the subset of mRNAs and inhibit their translation in a sequence-dependent manner. These responses may be reversible and regulated by physiological signals (Kosik, 2006).

Many microRNA genes are arranged in clusters. In this issue, Fiore show that the gene cluster miR379–410, which includes up to 50 microRNA genes, is induced by neuronal depolarization and has an important function in dendritic development in cultured neurons (Figure 1). miR-134, a member of this cluster, was earlier shown to be localized to dendrites of cultured hippocampal neurons, where it regulates dendritic spine morphology by its reversible inhibitory effect on LimK1 mRNA in response to BDNF (Schratt ). Here, Fiore et al provide evidence that these miRNAs are likely expressed from a single transcript, which is induced by neuronal activity (treatment with KCl or BDNF). The transcription factor, Mef2, was shown to bind an upstream element on this miRNA gene cluster and activate transcription upon stimulation. Mef2 was previously shown to be key negative regulator of activity-dependent synapse development (Flavell ), whose target genes likely play diverse functions at synapses (Flavell ). Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays identified Mef2 as the transcription factor for the miR379–410 cluster. In a series of elegant and well-integrated experiments to inhibit miRNA function, mutate miRNA-binding sites in target reporters, and use of siRNA to knockdown Mef2 expression, the authors provide compelling evidence that Mef2 was necessary for the activation of this microRNA gene cluster. Neuronal depolarization increased a subset of microRNA expression, which appears to have a significant effect on early dendritogenesis in cultured neurons. Increased miRNAs were linked to the increased complexity of dendritic arborization of stimulated neurons. Interestingly, only a few members of this miRNA cluster had a positive impact on the dendritic arborization, while others had no effect. This opens up the possibility that other microRNAs, which are also significantly induced by stimulation, might regulate other aspects of neuronal development and synapse formation. Knockdown of the transcription factor, Mef2, prevented the stimulus-induced increase in microRNAs (from the miR379–410 cluster) and also diminished the dendritic complexity. This finding is significant in its demonstration that a global response (transcriptional activation mediated by Mef2) is necessary for a local effect (dendritic arborization).

Figure 1

MicroRNAs from the miR379–410 cluster regulate dendritogenesis. Neuronal activity induces several microRNAs from the miR379–410 cluster in an Mef2-mediated pathway. One of these, miR-134, inhibits Pumilio2 protein synthesis essential for dendritogenesis.

Identifying valid mRNA targets for the members of this miR379–410 cluster and elucidating their relevance to dendritogenisis or other aspects of neuronal development will be a challenging task. Potentially, many microRNAs from this cluster might act on various mRNA targets in a coordinated manner to modulate dendritogenesis and spine morphology. Further studies in this direction are needed to clarify how these microRNAs function in neuronal development. In an exciting addition to this story, Fiore have identified Pumilio2 as a target of miR-134 whose inhibition is essential for activity-dependent dendritogenesis. Pumilio2 is localized to dendrites and proposed to act as translation repressor (Vessey ). The present study shows that miR-134 inhibits pumilio2 expression in an activity-dependent manner, which supports dendritogenesis. Using a luciferase reporter assay, they show that Mef2 mediates miR-134 induced inhibition of Pumilio2. It is unclear whether the modulation of Pumilio2 mRNA translation by miR-134 is localized to dendrites or restricted to the cell body. The possibility that this mechanism may occur locally is an interesting topic for further exploration, as shown for miR-134 regulation of LimK1 mRNA in dendrites of more mature cultures (Schratt ). An intriguing aspect here is the apparent opposite actions of miR-134 on mRNA translation needed for regulation of dendrite and spine morphology at different stages of development. During early stages of culture (DIV5-7), KCl or BDNF stimulation was shown in this study to promote miR-134 mediated inhibition of translation (Pumilio2), which facilitates dendritogenesis; however, at later stages (DIV14), similar stimulation paradigms actually relieve miR-134 mediated translational inhibition (LimK1) leading to increased size of spines (Schratt ). The authors provide an interesting speculation that miR-134 inhibition or activation of translation may be under developmental control and/or part of a homeostatic mechanism; either of these possibilities will require further clarification. More work is also needed to understand the mechanistic details of the possible dual nature of miR-134 function (either inducing or relieving the translation inhibition upon stimulation), and whether these activities may be bidirectionally regulated in dendrites in response to physiological patterns of neuronal activity.

The physiological significance of the microRNA pathway and its regulation in neuronal development is evident by its involvement in several neurological disorders, including fragile X syndrome, which is caused by the loss of FMRP. FMRP is an mRNA-binding protein that regulates synaptic protein synthesis and also associated with microRNA pathway (Jin ; Xu ; Cheever and Ceman, 2009). The significant defects in spine morphology and dendritogenesis seen in disorders such as fragile X syndrome have not been effectively reconciled at a mechanistic level. Further work is needed to understand how mRNA-binding proteins, like FMRP, may interact with miRNAs, or components of the RNAi pathway, to regulate local translation needed for neuronal development and plasticity. The present study motivates further work to elucidate the role of individual and/or clustered microRNAs in the regulation of neuronal function and dysfunction in neurological diseases. It is envisioned that manipulation of miRNA expression and function may be a promising direction for therapeutic intervention in human diseases of abnormal development and differentiation.