Literature DB >> 19295396

Measurement of systolic pressure variation during graded volume loss using simple tools on Datex Ohmeda S/5 monitor.

Padmaja Durga1, Nirmala Jonnavittula, Radhakrishnan Muthuchellappan, Gopinath Ramachandran.   

Abstract

Direct invasive arterial monitoring is performed routinely for all major neurosurgical procedures. Systolic pressure variation (SPV) used, independently or in combination with central venous pressure (CVP) allows optimal fluid management in hypovolemia and hemorrhage. This study aims to quantify SPV during graded hypovolemia using the simple technique described by Gouvea and Gouvea using Datex Ohmeda S/5, and to compare its reliability relative to other hemodynamic indicators of hypovolemia. Twenty anesthetized neurosurgical patients of ASA grade I and II patients were administered furosemide 0.5 mg/kg intravenously to obtain graded volume loss in the form of urine output. Invasive arterial pressure from radial artery and CVP were monitored using Datex OhmedaS/5 (Finland). Invasive arterial pressure label was changed to pulmonary artery label with the scale appropriate for arterial pressure. The trace was frozen in the wedge mode to reduce the sweep speed and the cursor was used to measure SPV and pulse pressure variation (PPV). Heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, CVP at zero end-expiratory pressure, SPV and PPV are measured at baseline, and after a urine output of 200 and 500 mL. There was a significant correlation between volume loss and CVP, SPV, and PPV. The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic analysis was >0.75 for CVP, SPV, and PPV. SPV of 7.5 mm Hg and a change of SPV by 4.5 mm Hg, a PPV of 4.5 and change in PPV by 2.5 mm Hg were the best cut-off values that corresponded to a volume change of 500 mL. This simple method enabled calculation of SPV without the computerized modules, and detected volume loss comparable to CVP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19295396     DOI: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181920d18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol        ISSN: 0898-4921            Impact factor:   3.956


  5 in total

1.  Pulse-plethysmographic variables in hemodynamic assessment during mannitol infusion.

Authors:  M Radhakrishnan; K Mohanvelu; S Veena; G Sripathy; G S Umamaheswara Rao
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Assessment of cardiac preload status by pulse pressure variation in patients after anesthesia induction: comparison with central venous pressure and initial distribution volume of glucose.

Authors:  Zhiyong He; Hui Qiao; Wei Zhou; Yun Wang; Zhendong Xu; Xuehua Che; Jun Zhang; Weimin Liang
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Intra-Operative Fluid Management in Adult Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumour Surgery: Randomised Control Trial Comparing Pulse Pressure Variance (PPV) and Central Venous Pressure (CVP).

Authors:  Shalini Cynthia Sundaram; Serina Ruth Salins; Amar Nandha Kumar; Grace Korula
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

4.  Arterial Pressure Variation in Elective Noncardiac Surgery: Identifying Reference Distributions and Modifying Factors.

Authors:  Michael R Mathis; Samuel A Schechtman; Milo C Engoren; Amy M Shanks; Aleda Thompson; Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Actualities in the anaesthetic management of pheochromocytoma/ paraganglioma.

Authors:  D Godoroja-Diarto; C Moldovan; V Tomulescu
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.104

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.