Literature DB >> 19295120

Deletion rate evolution and its effect on genome size and coding density.

Mats E Pettersson1, Charles G Kurland, Otto G Berg.   

Abstract

Deletion rates are thought to be important factors in determining the genome size of organisms in nature. Although it is indisputable that deletions, and thus deletion rates, affect genome size, it is unclear how, or indeed if, genome size is regulated via the deletion rate. Here, we employ a mathematical model to determine the evolutionary fate of deletion rate mutants. Simulations are employed to explore the interactions between deletions, deletion rate mutants, and genome size. The results show that, in this model, the fate of deletion rate mutants will depend on the fraction of essential genomic material, on the frequency of sexual recombination, as well as on the population size of the organism. We find that there is no optimal deletion rate in any state. However, at one critical coding density, all changes in deletion rate are neutral and the rate may drift either up or down. As a consequence, the coding density of the genome is expected to fluctuate around this critical density. Characteristic differences in the impact of deletion rate mutations on prokaryote and eukaryote genomes are described.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19295120     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  6 in total

Review 1.  Co-evolution between transposable elements and their hosts: a major factor in genome size evolution?

Authors:  J Arvid Ågren; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Reductive evolution of proteomes and protein structures.

Authors:  Minglei Wang; Charles G Kurland; Gustavo Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The exceptionally large chloroplast genome of the green alga Floydiella terrestris illuminates the evolutionary history of the Chlorophyceae.

Authors:  Jean-Simon Brouard; Christian Otis; Claude Lemieux; Monique Turmel
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.416

4.  Strong heterogeneity in mutation rate causes misleading hallmarks of natural selection on indel mutations in the human genome.

Authors:  Erika M Kvikstad; Laurent Duret
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Similar Ratios of Introns to Intergenic Sequence across Animal Genomes.

Authors:  Warren R Francis; Gert Wörheide
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Slow DNA loss in the gigantic genomes of salamanders.

Authors:  Cheng Sun; José R López Arriaza; Rachel Lockridge Mueller
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.416

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.