Literature DB >> 19294613

[Survey of sensory perception and patients' subjective assessment of the application of nasal sprays - the nasal-spray-sensoric-scale].

Ralph Mösges1, N Pasch, A Sayar, P Schmalz, J Vent.   

Abstract

AIM: The Nasal Spray Evaluation Questionnaire is a standardized means to evaluate hedonicity of nasal sprays in the English speaking countries. To date, there is no such questionnaire for German speaking patients. The here presented study aimed at evaluating the translated questionnaire. Three nasal sprays were tested and the questionnaire was used to estimate sensory hedonicity. Finally, the questionnaire was improved and can now serve as a standardized means to measure nasal sensory perceptions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The questionnaire was literally translated from English to German. There were three groups of 60 patients each presenting with the sensation of a 'dry nose' to a secondary medical center with a board certified otolaryngologist. The ingredients of the three different nasal sprays varied only in one phytotherapeutic addition. The first evaluation of the nasal spray was conducted immediately after application of the nasal spray, and two minutes after application. A third and optional telephone survey was performed several days later after continuous use of the spray.
RESULTS: The different evaluations of nasal sprays were already lined out after the first questionnaire. It could serve as a new, reliable and reproduceable tool for the evaluation of nasal sensory perceptions. DISCUSSION: The questionnaire served as an adequate tool to estimate hedonicity of nasal sprays. First results of the German version show, however, that it could facilitate the evaluation by restructuring the questionnaire. Continuously marking good grades with high points (maximum 100) and negative answers with low points (minimum 0 points) will unify and simplify the questionnaire.
CONCLUSION: The translation of the Nasal Spray Evaluation Questionnaire into a German version can serve as a new standard tool for measuring nasal sensation. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart * New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19294613     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1202369

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  4 in total

1.  The Contribution of Galenics to Patients' Sensory Perception of Nasal Sprays After Nasal Surgery: Data from a Prospective Randomised, Controlled, Double-Blind, Crossover, Multicentre Study.

Authors:  Christoph Bergmann; Jennifer Lander; Lea Radtke; Laura England; Jaswinder Singh; Ralph Mösges
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 3.845

2.  Tolerability and effects on quality of life of liposomal nasal spray treatment compared to nasal ointment containing dexpanthenol or isotonic NaCl spray in patients with rhinitis sicca.

Authors:  C Hahn; M Böhm; S Allekotte; R Mösges
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Liposomal Nasal Spray versus Guideline-Recommended Steroid Nasal Spray in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Comparison of Tolerability and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Anna Eitenmüller; Lisa Piano; Myriam Böhm; Kija Shah-Hosseini; Andreas Glowania; Oliver Pfaar; Ralph Mösges; Ludger Klimek
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2014-05-22

4.  Efficacy and tolerability of an ectoine mouth and throat spray compared with those of saline lozenges in the treatment of acute pharyngitis and/or laryngitis: a prospective, controlled, observational clinical trial.

Authors:  Dörte Müller; Torben Lindemann; Kija Shah-Hosseini; Olaf Scherner; Markus Knop; Andreas Bilstein; Ralph Mösges
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 2.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.