Literature DB >> 19294545

What factors predict full or partial return to work among sickness absentees with spinal pain participating in rehabilitation?

Britt Elfving1, Malin Asell, Annina Ropponen, Kristina Alexanderson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify the factors that predict full or partial return to work among long-term (> or =90 days) sickness absentees due to spinal pain who begin a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme.
METHOD: In a prospective cohort study, 312 patients with neck, thoracic and/or lumbar pain, aged 20-64, participated in a 4-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme in Sweden. Questionnaire data at inclusion were used. Factors included in logistic regressions were as follows: age, gender, type of work, pain location, pain intensity (visual analogue scale), activity limitations [Disability Rating Index (DRI)], health-related quality of life (SF-36), pain-related fear of movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), motivation (Self Motivation Inventory), sickness absence at baseline and number of sick-leave days during the previous 2 years. Outcome factor was increased versus not increased working time at follow-up 6 months later.
RESULTS: Most patients (68%) reported two or three pain locations. At baseline, 56% were full-time sickness absent and 23% at follow-up; 61% had increased their working time. Predictors for increased working time were age below 40 years, low activity limitation (DRI < 50), low SF-36 bodily pain (> 30) and high SF-36 social functioning (> 60). Number of sick-leave days during the previous 2 years (md 360; range 90-730) had no influence.
CONCLUSIONS: Even patients with long previous sick leave can increase working time after a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme, especially if they are younger, have lower levels of activity limitations and pain and better social functioning. To include information on part-time work is useful when evaluating work ability following rehabilitation programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19294545     DOI: 10.1080/09638280802572965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Disabil Rehabil        ISSN: 0963-8288            Impact factor:   3.033


  9 in total

1.  Workers who stay at work despite chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: do they differ from workers with sick leave?

Authors:  Haitze J de Vries; Michiel F Reneman; Johan W Groothoff; Jan H B Geertzen; Sandra Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-12

2.  Work Disability Trajectories Among Individuals with a Sick-Leave Spell Due to Depressive Episode ≥ 21 Days: A Prospective Cohort Study with 13-Month Follow Up.

Authors:  Kristin Farrants; Emilie Friberg; Sara Sjölund; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-12

Review 3.  Person-related factors associated with work participation in employees with health problems: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mariska de Wit; Haije Wind; Carel T J Hulshof; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Prediction of 2-year work participation in sickness absentees with neck or shoulder pain: the contribution of demographic, patient-reported, clinical and imaging information.

Authors:  Line Thorndal Moll; Anne Mette Schmidt; Christina Malmose Stapelfeldt; Merete Labriola; Ole Kudsk Jensen; Morten Wasmod Kindt; Tue Secher Jensen; Berit Schiøttz-Christensen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Distribution and prevalence of musculoskeletal pain co-occurring with persistent low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cecilie K Øverås; Melker S Johansson; Tarcisio F de Campos; Manuela L Ferreira; Bård Natvig; Paul J Mork; Jan Hartvigsen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Multiple transitions in sick leave, disability benefits, and return to work. - A 4-year follow-up of patients participating in a work-related rehabilitation program.

Authors:  Irene Oyeflaten; Stein Atle Lie; Camilla M Ihlebæk; Hege R Eriksen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Does feeling respected influence return to work? Cross-sectional study on sick-listed patients' experiences of encounters with social insurance office staff.

Authors:  Niels Lynöe; Maja Wessel; Daniel Olsson; Kristina Alexanderson; Gert Helgesson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Let's get back to work: survival analysis on the return-to-work after depression.

Authors:  Pepijn Vemer; Clazien A Bouwmans; Moniek C Zijlstra-Vlasveld; Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis; Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 2.570

9.  Factors associated with sickness certification of injured workers by General Practitioners in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Rasa Ruseckaite; Alex Collie; Maatje Scheepers; Bianca Brijnath; Agnieszka Kosny; Danielle Mazza
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.