PURPOSE: To identify the factors that predict full or partial return to work among long-term (> or =90 days) sickness absentees due to spinal pain who begin a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme. METHOD: In a prospective cohort study, 312 patients with neck, thoracic and/or lumbar pain, aged 20-64, participated in a 4-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme in Sweden. Questionnaire data at inclusion were used. Factors included in logistic regressions were as follows: age, gender, type of work, pain location, pain intensity (visual analogue scale), activity limitations [Disability Rating Index (DRI)], health-related quality of life (SF-36), pain-related fear of movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), motivation (Self Motivation Inventory), sickness absence at baseline and number of sick-leave days during the previous 2 years. Outcome factor was increased versus not increased working time at follow-up 6 months later. RESULTS: Most patients (68%) reported two or three pain locations. At baseline, 56% were full-time sickness absent and 23% at follow-up; 61% had increased their working time. Predictors for increased working time were age below 40 years, low activity limitation (DRI < 50), low SF-36 bodily pain (> 30) and high SF-36 social functioning (> 60). Number of sick-leave days during the previous 2 years (md 360; range 90-730) had no influence. CONCLUSIONS: Even patients with long previous sick leave can increase working time after a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme, especially if they are younger, have lower levels of activity limitations and pain and better social functioning. To include information on part-time work is useful when evaluating work ability following rehabilitation programmes.
PURPOSE: To identify the factors that predict full or partial return to work among long-term (> or =90 days) sickness absentees due to spinal pain who begin a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme. METHOD: In a prospective cohort study, 312 patients with neck, thoracic and/or lumbar pain, aged 20-64, participated in a 4-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme in Sweden. Questionnaire data at inclusion were used. Factors included in logistic regressions were as follows: age, gender, type of work, pain location, pain intensity (visual analogue scale), activity limitations [Disability Rating Index (DRI)], health-related quality of life (SF-36), pain-related fear of movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), motivation (Self Motivation Inventory), sickness absence at baseline and number of sick-leave days during the previous 2 years. Outcome factor was increased versus not increased working time at follow-up 6 months later. RESULTS: Most patients (68%) reported two or three pain locations. At baseline, 56% were full-time sickness absent and 23% at follow-up; 61% had increased their working time. Predictors for increased working time were age below 40 years, low activity limitation (DRI < 50), low SF-36 bodily pain (> 30) and high SF-36 social functioning (> 60). Number of sick-leave days during the previous 2 years (md 360; range 90-730) had no influence. CONCLUSIONS: Even patients with long previous sick leave can increase working time after a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme, especially if they are younger, have lower levels of activity limitations and pain and better social functioning. To include information on part-time work is useful when evaluating work ability following rehabilitation programmes.
Authors: Mariska de Wit; Haije Wind; Carel T J Hulshof; Monique H W Frings-Dresen Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2018-04-26 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Cecilie K Øverås; Melker S Johansson; Tarcisio F de Campos; Manuela L Ferreira; Bård Natvig; Paul J Mork; Jan Hartvigsen Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-01-18 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Niels Lynöe; Maja Wessel; Daniel Olsson; Kristina Alexanderson; Gert Helgesson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-03-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Pepijn Vemer; Clazien A Bouwmans; Moniek C Zijlstra-Vlasveld; Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis; Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen Journal: Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 2.570