PURPOSE: This phase I study explored gefitinib (G) and capecitabine (C) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Sequential cohorts (n = 3) received G and escalating C on a 14 day on/7 day off schedule, with a validation cohort (n = 10) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined in cycle 1. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included response and adherence. RESULTS: About 19 patients were treated for a median of 5 cycles. No patients in sequential cohorts experienced DLT; C MTD was 2,000 mg/m(2)/day when paired with daily G 250 mg. In the validation cohort, four experienced serious toxicities, including diarrhea, mucositis, and palmarplantar dysesthesia. At the MTD, 6 (46%) required a C dose reduction, and 3 (23%) came off study for toxicity. One partial response was observed (8%, 95% CI 0.2-38.5%); five had stable disease >24 weeks (26, 95% CI 9-51%). Patients missed few drug doses, with the suggestion of overadherence to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase I study of G and C in MBC, a C MTD was identified, and significant toxicity was observed. About 8% demonstrated a response, with 26% maintaining stable disease. The possibility of overadherence, as suggested in this study, may have implications for other trials of oral antineoplastic therapy.
PURPOSE: This phase I study explored gefitinib (G) and capecitabine (C) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Sequential cohorts (n = 3) received G and escalating C on a 14 day on/7 day off schedule, with a validation cohort (n = 10) at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined in cycle 1. The primary endpoint was safety; secondary endpoints included response and adherence. RESULTS: About 19 patients were treated for a median of 5 cycles. No patients in sequential cohorts experienced DLT; C MTD was 2,000 mg/m(2)/day when paired with daily G 250 mg. In the validation cohort, four experienced serious toxicities, including diarrhea, mucositis, and palmarplantar dysesthesia. At the MTD, 6 (46%) required a C dose reduction, and 3 (23%) came off study for toxicity. One partial response was observed (8%, 95% CI 0.2-38.5%); five had stable disease >24 weeks (26, 95% CI 9-51%). Patients missed few drug doses, with the suggestion of overadherence to therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase I study of G and C in MBC, a C MTD was identified, and significant toxicity was observed. About 8% demonstrated a response, with 26% maintaining stable disease. The possibility of overadherence, as suggested in this study, may have implications for other trials of oral antineoplastic therapy.
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Diane Prager; Robert Hermann; Lou Fehrenbacher; Bruce E Johnson; Alan Sandler; Mark G Kris; Hai T Tran; Pam Klein; Xin Li; David Ramies; David H Johnson; Vincent A Miller Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Andreas Polychronis; H Dudley Sinnett; Dimitri Hadjiminas; Hemant Singhal; Janine L Mansi; Dharsha Shivapatham; Sami Shousha; Jie Jiang; David Peston; Nigel Barrett; David Vigushin; Ken Morrison; Emma Beresford; Simak Ali; Martin J Slade; R Charles Coombes Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Malcolm Ranson; Lisa A Hammond; David Ferry; Mark Kris; Andrew Tullo; Philip I Murray; Vince Miller; Steve Averbuch; Judy Ochs; Charles Morris; Andrea Feyereislova; Helen Swaisland; Eric K Rowinsky Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J A Oshaughnessy; J Blum; V Moiseyenko; S E Jones; D Miles; D Bell; R Rosso; L Mauriac; B Osterwalder; H U Burger; S Laws Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Chunhua Lu; Corey Speers; Yun Zhang; Xiaochun Xu; Jamal Hill; Emily Steinbis; Joseph Celestino; Qiang Shen; Heetae Kim; Susan Hilsenbeck; Syed K Mohsin; Alan Wakeling; C Kent Osborne; Powel H Brown Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-12-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Antoinette R Tan; Xiaowei Yang; Stephen M Hewitt; Arlene Berman; Erin R Lepper; Alex Sparreboom; Allyson L Parr; William D Figg; Catherine Chow; Seth M Steinberg; Stephen L Bacharach; Millie Whatley; Jorge A Carrasquillo; Jaime S Brahim; Seth A Ettenberg; Stan Lipkowitz; Sandra M Swain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-08-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Giuseppe Giaccone; Roy S Herbst; Christian Manegold; Giorgio Scagliotti; Rafael Rosell; Vincent Miller; Ronald B Natale; Joan H Schiller; Joachim Von Pawel; Anna Pluzanska; Ulrich Gatzemeier; John Grous; Judith S Ochs; Steven D Averbuch; Michael K Wolf; Pamela Rennie; Abderrahim Fandi; David H Johnson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Fan Zhang; Jie Zhang; Moyan Liu; Lichao Zhao; RuiXia LingHu; Fan Feng; Xudong Gao; Shunchang Jiao; Lei Zhao; Yi Hu; Junlan Yang Journal: Oncoimmunology Date: 2015-01-22 Impact factor: 8.110
Authors: Joseph A Greer; Nicole Amoyal; Lauren Nisotel; Joel N Fishbein; James MacDonald; Jamie Stagl; Inga Lennes; Jennifer S Temel; Steven A Safren; William F Pirl Journal: Oncologist Date: 2016-02-26
Authors: Ann H Partridge; Laura Archer; Alice B Kornblith; Julie Gralow; Debjani Grenier; Edith Perez; Antonio C Wolff; Xiaofei Wang; Helen Kastrissios; Donald Berry; Clifford Hudis; Eric Winer; Hyman Muss Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carlos L Arteaga; Mark X Sliwkowski; C Kent Osborne; Edith A Perez; Fabio Puglisi; Luca Gianni Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: K J Ruddy; B N Pitcher; L E Archer; H J Cohen; E P Winer; C A Hudis; H B Muss; A H Partridge Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2012-07-05 Impact factor: 32.976