Literature DB >> 19294432

A comparison of angled sagittal MRI and conventional MRI in the diagnosis of herniated disc and stenosis in the cervical foramen.

Jung Hyun Shim1, Choon Keun Park, Ju Hyun Lee, Jin Wook Choi, Dong Chan Lee, Dong Hyun Kim, Jae Keon Kim, Jang Hoe Hwang.   

Abstract

The object of this study is to demonstrate that angled sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables the precise diagnosis of herniated disc and stenosis in the cervical foramen, which is not available with conventional MRI. Due to both the anatomic features of the cervical foramen and the limitations of conventional MR techniques, it has been difficult to identify disease in the lateral aspects of the spinal canal and foramen using only conventional MRI. Angled sagittal MRI oriented perpendicular to the true course of the foramina facilitates the identification of the lateral disease. A review of 43 patients, who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion, is presented with a herniated disc and/or stenosis in the cervical foramen. They all had undergone conventional MRI and angled sagittal MRI. Fifty levels were surgically explored for evidence of foraminal herniated disc and stenosis. The results of each test were correlated with what was found at each explored surgical level. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both examinations for making the diagnosis of foraminal herniated disc and stenosis were compared. During the diagnosis of foraminal herniated disc, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of angled sagittal MRI were 96.7, 95.0, and 96.0%, respectively, compared with 56.7, 85.0, and 68.0% for conventional MRI. In making the diagnosis of foraminal stenosis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of angled sagittal MRI were 96.3, 95.7, and 96.0%, respectively, compared with 40.7, 91.3, and 66.0% for conventional MRI. In the above groups, the difference between the tests for making the diagnosis of both foraminal herniated disc and stenosis was found to be statistically significant in sensitivity and accuracy. Angled sagittal MRI was a more accurate test compared to conventional MRI for making the diagnosis of herniated disc and stenosis in the cervical foramen. It can be utilized for the precise diagnosis of foraminal herniated disc and stenosis difficult or ambiguous in conventional MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19294432      PMCID: PMC2899504          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0932-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  17 in total

1.  Varying gradient angles and offsets to optimize imaging planes in MR.

Authors:  R M Slone; L L Buck; J R Fitzsimmons
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  The cervical nerves and foramina: local-coil MR imaging.

Authors:  D L Daniels; J S Hyde; J B Kneeland; A Jesmanowicz; W Froncisz; T M Grist; P Pech; A L Williams; V M Haughton
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Oblique plane MR imaging of the cervical spine.

Authors:  D O Yenerich; V M Haughton
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1986 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Oblique planes of section in MR imaging.

Authors:  R R Edelman; D D Stark; S Saini; J T Ferrucci; R E Dinsmore; W Ladd; T J Brady
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  The cervical neural foramina: correlation of microtomy and CT anatomy.

Authors:  P Pech; D L Daniels; A L Williams; V M Haughton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  MR imaging of the normal knee.

Authors:  K C Li; R M Henkelman; P Y Poon; J Rubenstein
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Diagnosis of cervical disc disease. MRI versus cervical myelography.

Authors:  G Perneczky; F W Böck; A Neuhold; M Stiskal
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.216

8.  3D MRI of the cervical spine: low flip angle FISP vs. Gd-DTPA TurboFLASH in degenerative disk disease.

Authors:  J S Ross; P M Ruggieri; M Glicklich; N Obuchowski; J Dillinger; T J Masaryk; Y Qu; M T Modic
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Correlative investigations of craniospinal anatomy and pathology with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and cryomicrotomy.

Authors:  P Pech
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1988

10.  Diagnostic imaging algorithm for cervical soft disc herniation.

Authors:  E Van de Kelft; M van Vyve
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 10.154

View more
  16 in total

1.  [Utility of coronal oblique slices in cervical spine MRI: Improved detection of the neuroforamina].

Authors:  W Freund; S Klessinger; M Mueller; M-E Halatsch; G Hoepner; F Weber; B Schmitz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review: a survey of the "medical" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2009.

Authors:  Michel Benoist
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  How old is your cervical spine? Cervical spine biological age: a new evaluation scale.

Authors:  Venceslao Wierzbicki; Alessandro Pesce; Luigi Marrocco; Emanuele Piccione; Claudio Colonnese; Riccardo Caruso
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.

Authors:  H-J Park; S S Kim; S-Y Lee; N-H Park; E-C Chung; M-H Rho; H-J Kwon; S-H Kook
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy.

Authors:  Myung Soo Youn; Myeong Hwan Shon; Yoon Jae Seong; Jong Ki Shin; Tae Sik Goh; Jung Sub Lee
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Cervical Radiculopathy due to Cervical Degenerative Diseases : Anatomy, Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tae Kim; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-12-31

7.  Comparison of two MR grading systems for correlation between grade of cervical neural foraminal stenosis and clinical manifestations.

Authors:  Kyu H Lee; Hee J Park; So Y Lee; Eun C Chung; Myung H Rho; Hyunchul Shin; Young J Kwon
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  The Effect of Oblique Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Surgical Decision Making for Patients Undergoing an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Gregory D Schroeder; Linda I Suleiman; Michael A Chioffe; John J Mangan; James C McKenzie; Christopher K Kepler; Mark F Kurd; Alexander R Vaccaro; Jason W Savage; Wellington K Hsu; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06-30

9.  Imaging of Herniated Discs of the Cervical Spine: Inter-Modality Differences between 64-Slice Multidetector CT and 1.5-T MRI.

Authors:  Ji Sook Yi; Jang Gyu Cha; Jong Kyu Han; Hyun-Joo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  A New MRI Grading System for Cervical Foraminal Stenosis Based on Axial T2-Weighted Images.

Authors:  Sujin Kim; Joon Woo Lee; Jee Won Chai; Hye Jin Yoo; Yusuhn Kang; Jiwoon Seo; Joong Mo Ahn; Heung Sik Kang
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.