Literature DB >> 19293169

U-type exchange is the most frequent mechanism for inverted duplication with terminal deletion rearrangements.

L R Rowe, J-Y Lee, L Rector, E B Kaminsky, A R Brothman, C L Martin, S T South.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chromosomal rearrangements resulting in an interstitial inverted duplication with concomitant terminal deletion were first described for the short arm of chromosome 8 in 1976. Since then, this type of alteration has been identified and characterised for most chromosome arms. Three mechanisms are commonly proposed to explain the origin of this type of rearrangement. All three mechanisms involve formation of a dicentric chromosome that then breaks in a subsequent meiotic division to produce a monocentric duplicated and deleted chromosome. However, the events leading to the formation of the dicentric chromosome differ between the mechanisms. In one mechanism, either parent carries a paracentric inversion. This results in formation of a loop during meiotic pairing with a recombination event occurring in the loop. In the second mechanism, inverted low copy repeats in the same chromosome arm allow partial folding of one homologue onto itself with a recombination event between the inverted repeats. The third mechanism involves a pre-meiotic double-strand break with subsequent fusion, or U-type exchange, between the sister chromatids. The first two mechanisms require a single copy region to exist between the duplicated and deleted regions on the derivative chromosome, and therefore high resolution analysis of the rearrangement can be used to distinguish between these mechanisms. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Using G-banded chromosome analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH), we describe 17 new cases of inverted duplication with terminal deletion of 2q, 4p, 5p, 6q, 8p, 9p, 10q, 13q, 15q, 18p, 18q, and 22q.
CONCLUSIONS: These new cases, combined with previously described cases, demonstrate that U-type exchange is the most frequent mechanism for this rearrangement and can be observed on most, or perhaps all, chromosome arms.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19293169     DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2008.065052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  23 in total

1.  De novo unbalanced translocations have a complex history/aetiology.

Authors:  Maria Clara Bonaglia; Nehir Edibe Kurtas; Edoardo Errichiello; Sara Bertuzzo; Silvana Beri; Mana M Mehrjouy; Aldesia Provenzano; Debora Vergani; Vanna Pecile; Francesca Novara; Paolo Reho; Marilena Carmela Di Giacomo; Giancarlo Discepoli; Roberto Giorda; Micheala A Aldred; Cíntia Barros Santos-Rebouças; Andressa Pereira Goncalves; Diane N Abuelo; Sabrina Giglio; Ivana Ricca; Fabrizia Franchi; Philippos Patsalis; Carolina Sismani; María Angeles Morí; Julián Nevado; Niels Tommerup; Orsetta Zuffardi
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Genomic characterization of prenatally detected chromosomal structural abnormalities using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Peining Li; Pawel Pomianowski; Miriam S DiMaio; Joanne R Florio; Michael R Rossi; Bixia Xiang; Fang Xu; Hui Yang; Qian Geng; Jiansheng Xie; Maurice J Mahoney
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 3.  Ring chromosomes: from formation to clinical potential.

Authors:  Inna E Pristyazhnyuk; Aleksei G Menzorov
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.356

4.  Inverted Duplication and Deletion of 10q25q26 in a Patient without Any Obvious Skeletal Anomalies.

Authors:  B Xiao; X Ji; Y Xing; W-T Jiang; J-M Zhang; J Tao
Journal:  Mol Syndromol       Date:  2012-09-27

5.  Clinical and genomic evaluation of 201 patients with Phelan-McDermid syndrome.

Authors:  Sara M Sarasua; Luigi Boccuto; Julia L Sharp; Alka Dwivedi; Chin-Fu Chen; Jonathan D Rollins; R Curtis Rogers; Katy Phelan; Barbara R DuPont
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Genomic profile of copy number variants on the short arm of human chromosome 8.

Authors:  Shihui Yu; Stephanie Fiedler; Andrew Stegner; William D Graf
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  De novo dir dup/del of 18q characterized by SNP arrays and FISH in a girl child with mixed phenotypes.

Authors:  Carlos Córdova-Fletes; Enrique Sáinz-González; Roberto Iván Avendaño-Gálvez; Azubel Ramírez-Velazco; Horacio Rivera; Rocío Ortiz-López; Eliakym Arámbula-Meraz; Verónica Judith Picos-Cárdenas
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  8p23.2-pter Microdeletions: Seven New Cases Narrowing the Candidate Region and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Ilaria Catusi; Maria Garzo; Anna Paola Capra; Silvana Briuglia; Chiara Baldo; Maria Paola Canevini; Rachele Cantone; Flaviana Elia; Francesca Forzano; Ornella Galesi; Enrico Grosso; Michela Malacarne; Angela Peron; Corrado Romano; Monica Saccani; Lidia Larizza; Maria Paola Recalcati
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Trisomy Xp and partial tetrasomy Xq resulting from gain of a rearranged X chromosome in a female fetus: pathogenic or not?

Authors:  Maria Yiu; Zhongxia Qi; Anita Ki; Jingwei Yu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Large inverted duplications in the human genome form via a fold-back mechanism.

Authors:  Karen E Hermetz; Scott Newman; Karen N Conneely; Christa L Martin; Blake C Ballif; Lisa G Shaffer; Jannine D Cody; M Katharine Rudd
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.