Literature DB >> 19291997

Accurate estimation of compressed breast thickness in mammography.

Gordon E Mawdsley1, Albert H Tyson, Chris L Peressotti, Roberta A Jong, Martin J Yaffe.   

Abstract

The determination of volumetric breast density (VBD) from mammograms requires an accurate knowledge of the thickness of the compressed breast. Previously, the authors described a technique for measuring local thicknesses using optical stereoscopic photogrammetry [A. H. Tyson, G. E. Mawdsley, and M. J. Yaffe, "Measurement of compressed breast thickness by optical stereoscopic photogrammetry," Med. Phys. 36(2), 569-576 (2009)]. Here, the authors describe the use of this tool to guide the development of a simpler, more practical field technique for the estimation of breast thickness and test its accuracy. Phantoms were constructed having similar shapes and compression characteristics to breasts of different sizes. These phantoms were compressed at different forces on several types of mammography units and their thickness under compression was measured using optical stereoscopic photogrammetry at many points of contact with the compression plate. A prediction equation was developed that uses the readout of compressed thickness and compression force provided by the mammography system to estimate local breast thickness. Using this approach, systems can be calibrated to an accuracy of better than 5 mm in thickness using a simple test object compared to an error of up to 15 mm associated with using only the thickness readout of the mammography machine. On the systems tested, the estimated value of VBD obtained using this method is significantly reduced from that determined using the constant thickness reported by the mammography machine.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19291997     DOI: 10.1118/1.3065068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  17 in total

1.  X-ray absorptiometry of the breast using mammographic exposure factors: application to units featuring automatic beam quality selection.

Authors:  C J Kotre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Mammographic density measurements are not affected by mammography system.

Authors:  Christine N Damases; Patrick C Brennan; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-03-04

4.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Cumulative sum quality control for calibrated breast density measurements.

Authors:  John J Heine; Ke Cao; Craig Beam
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  X-ray phase-shifts-based method of volumetric breast density measurement.

Authors:  Xizeng Wu; Aimin Yan; Hong Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  The compressed breast during mammography and breast tomosynthesis: in vivo shape characterization and modeling.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Greeshma A Agasthya; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Pressure and breast thickness in mammography--an exploratory calibration study.

Authors:  P Hogg; M Taylor; K Szczepura; C Mercer; E Denton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms.

Authors:  O Alonzo-Proulx; N Packard; J M Boone; A Al-Mayah; K K Brock; S Z Shen; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Full field digital mammography and breast density: comparison of calibrated and noncalibrated measurements.

Authors:  John J Heine; Erin E E Fowler; Chris I Flowers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.