Literature DB >> 19291996

Measurement of compressed breast thickness by optical stereoscopic photogrammetry.

Albert H Tyson1, Gordon E Mawdsley, Martin J Yaffe.   

Abstract

The determination of volumetric breast density (VBD) from mammograms requires accurate knowledge of the thickness of the compressed breast. In attempting to accurately determine VBD from images obtained on conventional mammography systems, the authors found that the thickness reported by a number of mammography systems in the field varied by as much as 15 mm when compressing the same breast or phantom. In order to evaluate the behavior of mammographic compression systems and to be able to predict the thickness at different locations in the breast on patients, they have developed a method for measuring the local thickness of the breast at all points of contact with the compression paddle using optical stereoscopic photogrammetry. On both flat (solid) and compressible phantoms, the measurements were accurate to better than 1 mm with a precision of 0.2 mm. In a pilot study, this method was used to measure thickness on 108 volunteers who were undergoing mammography examination. This measurement tool will allow us to characterize paddle surface deformations, deflections and calibration offsets for mammographic units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19291996     DOI: 10.1118/1.3065066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  12 in total

1.  X-ray absorptiometry of the breast using mammographic exposure factors: application to units featuring automatic beam quality selection.

Authors:  C J Kotre
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Mammographic density measurements are not affected by mammography system.

Authors:  Christine N Damases; Patrick C Brennan; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-03-04

3.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Cumulative sum quality control for calibrated breast density measurements.

Authors:  John J Heine; Ke Cao; Craig Beam
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  The compressed breast during mammography and breast tomosynthesis: in vivo shape characterization and modeling.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodríguez-Ruiz; Greeshma A Agasthya; Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Validation of a method for measuring the volumetric breast density from digital mammograms.

Authors:  O Alonzo-Proulx; N Packard; J M Boone; A Al-Mayah; K K Brock; S Z Shen; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A Quantification Method for Breast Tissue Thickness and Iodine Concentration Using Photon-Counting Detector.

Authors:  Seokmin Han
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Full field digital mammography and breast density: comparison of calibrated and noncalibrated measurements.

Authors:  John J Heine; Erin E E Fowler; Chris I Flowers
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Effective radiation attenuation calibration for breast density: compression thickness influences and correction.

Authors:  John J Heine; Ke Cao; Jerry A Thomas
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 10.  A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation.

Authors:  Wenda He; Arne Juette; Erika R E Denton; Arnau Oliver; Robert Martí; Reyer Zwiggelaar
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-06-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.