Literature DB >> 19291566

Video laryngoscopy with the macintosh video laryngoscope in simulated prehospital scenarios by paramedic students.

Michael Aziz1, Dawn Dillman, Jeffrey R Kirsch, Ansgar Brambrink.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of the Karl Storz BERCI DCI Macintosh video laryngoscope (MVL) via the TELE PACK system for facilitating intubation by novice paramedic students in a simulation environment. We assessed the laryngeal view, measured by percentage of glottic opening (POGO), when intubating the SimMan manikin airway in different settings. The primary endpoint was the best POGO achieved by the student. Secondary endpoints included intubation times and success rate.
METHOD: We enrolled 25 novice paramedic students to intubate SimMan manikins. Students were randomized to use either a conventional Macintosh 3 (Mac3) blade alone or the MVL with a Mac3 blade. Students attempted their first intubation with the manikin on a stretcher in a normal neck position and reattempted intubation with the manikin's neck stiffened. The groups then crossed over using the alternate device to repeat the attempts in the manikin with a normal neck and with a stiffened neck. The students then attempted the same sequence of four intubations with the manikin on the floor.
RESULTS: The MVL significantly improved POGO in all scenarios (p < 0.05). The MVL improved mean POGO 16% +/- 6% in the manikin with a normal neck position on a stretcher and 33% +/- 7% in the manikin with a stiff neck on the floor. The improvement was significantly greater in simulated difficult scenarios. The intubation success rate (94%) was equal in the two groups, and the POGO was significantly worse in the failures. In some subgroups, intubation times were longer with the MVL.
CONCLUSION: The MVL improves the laryngeal view for novice laryngoscopists in a simulated setting, and this improvement is greatest in simulated difficult scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19291566     DOI: 10.1080/10903120802706070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Indirect laryngoscopy : Alternatives to securing the airway].

Authors:  R R Noppens; C Werner; T Piepho
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Video Assisted Laryngoscope Facilitates Intubation Skill Learning in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Su Ann Yong; Chung-Hsien Chaou; Shiuan-Ruey Yu; Jen-Tse Kuan; Chih-Chung Lin; Hung-Pin Liu; Te-Fa Chiu
Journal:  J Acute Med       Date:  2020-06-01

Review 3.  Mapping the use of simulation in prehospital care - a literature review.

Authors:  Anna Abelsson; Ingrid Rystedt; Björn-Ove Suserud; Lillemor Lindwall
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  A review of the literature: direct and video laryngoscopy with simulation as educational intervention.

Authors:  Allison A Vanderbilt; Julie Mayglothling; Nicholas J Pastis; Douglas Franzen
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2014-01-28

5.  Videolaryngoscopy.

Authors:  Rv Chemsian; S Bhananker; R Ramaiah
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-01

6.  Comparison of the TruView infant EVO2 PCD™ and C-MAC video laryngoscopes with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy for routine tracheal intubation in infants with normal airways.

Authors:  Haitham Mutlak; Udo Rolle; Willi Rosskopf; Richard Schalk; Kai Zacharowski; Dirk Meininger; Christian Byhahn
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Comparison of the force applied on oral structures during intubation attempts by novice physicians between the Macintosh direct laryngoscope, Airway Scope and C-MAC PM: a high-fidelity simulator-based study.

Authors:  Taizo Nakanishi; Takashi Shiga; Yosuke Homma; Yasuaki Koyama; Tadahiro Goto
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Video laryngoscopy in pre-hospital critical care - a quality improvement study.

Authors:  Marianne Grønnebæk Rhode; Mads Partridge Vandborg; Vibeke Bladt; Leif Rognås
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Videolaryngoscopes differ substantially in illumination of the oral cavity: A manikin study.

Authors:  Barbe Ma Pieters; André Aj van Zundert
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2016-05

10.  Comparing the McGrath Mac Video Laryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscopy for Prehospital Emergency Intubation in Air Rescue Patients: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Janett Kreutziger; Sonja Hornung; Clemens Harrer; Wilhelm Urschl; Reinhard Doppler; Wolfgang G Voelckel; Helmut Trimmel
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.598

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.