Literature DB >> 19291559

Can paramedics read ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction on prehospital 12-lead electrocardiograms?

Ketan Trivedi1, Jeremiah D Schuur, David C Cone.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory prior to patient arrival at the hospital, based on a prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), reduces door-to-balloon time by 10-55 minutes for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In emergency medical services (EMS) systems where transmission of the ECG to the emergency department (ED) is not feasible, the ability of paramedics to accurately read 12-lead ECGs is crucial to the success of a prehospital catheterization laboratory activation program. Objective. To determine whether paramedics can accurately diagnose STEMI on a prehospital 12-lead ECG and decide to activate the cardiac catheterization laboratory appropriately.
METHODS: Five chest pain scenarios were generated, with standardized prehospital ECGs accompanying each: three STEMI cases that should result in catheterization laboratory activation and two non-STEMI cases that should not. A convenience sample of paramedics in an urban/suburban EMS system examined each scenario and ECG, and indicated whether the patient had STEMI and whether they would activate the catheterization laboratory. A series of demographic and operational questions were also asked of each participant. We report diagnostic statistics, agreement (kappa), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: A convenience sample of 103 of 147 eligible paramedics (70%) was enrolled. For STEMI diagnosis, paramedics' sensitivity was 92.6% (95% CI 88.9-95.1) and specificity was 85.4% (79.7-89.8); for catheterization laboratory activation, sensitivity was 88.0% (83.8-91.3) and specificity was 88.3% (83.0-92.2). False-positive activation of the catheterization laboratory occurred in 8.1% (5.4-12.0) of cases. Of the STEMI cases, 94.1% were correctly read as STEMI, and 91.0% had the catheterization laboratory appropriately activated. Of the non-STEMI cases, 14.9% were incorrectly read as STEMI, and 12.0% had the catheterization laboratory inappropriately activated. The paramedics' comfort with calling a "chest pain alert" with no resulting catheterization laboratory activation (the current practice in this system) was not statistically different from their comfort with calling a chest pain alert if that call were to automatically result in catheterization laboratory activation (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Paramedics in an urban/suburban EMS system can diagnose STEMI and identify appropriate cardiac catheterization laboratory activations with a high degree of accuracy, and an acceptable false-positive rate, when tested using paper-based scenarios.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19291559     DOI: 10.1080/10903120802706153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  9 in total

1.  Mortality and ST resolution in patients admitted with STEMI: the MOMI survey of emergency service experience in a complex urban area.

Authors:  Niccolò Grieco; Giovanni Sesana; Elena Corrada; Francesca Ieva; Annamaria Paganoni; Maurizio Marzegalli
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2012-09

2.  A Statewide Assessment of Prehospital Electrocardiography Approaches of Acquisition and Interpretation for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Based on Emergency Medical Services Characteristics.

Authors:  Jessica K Zègre-Hemsey; Mehul D Patel; Antonio R Fernandez; Michele M Pelter; Jane Brice; Wayne Rosamond
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 3.  Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Koushik Reddy; Asma Khaliq; Robert J Henning
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-26

4.  Prehospital ECG with ST-depression and T-wave inversion are associated with new onset heart failure in individuals transported by ambulance for suspected acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Jessica K Zègre-Hemsey; Melanie Hogg; Jamie Crandell; Michele M Pelter; Len Gettes; Eugene H Chung; David Pearson; Pilar Tochiki; Jonathan R Studnek; Wayne Rosamond
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 1.438

Review 5.  Achieving the earliest possible reperfusion in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a current overview.

Authors:  Takahiro Nakashima; Yoshio Tahara
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2018-03-15

6.  Prehospital identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and mortality (ANZACS-QI 61).

Authors:  Becky Yi-Wen Liao; Mildred Ai Wei Lee; Bridget Dicker; Verity F Todd; Ralph Stewart; Katrina Poppe; Andrew Kerr
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2022-01

7.  Emergency activations for chest pain and ventricular arrhythmias related to regional COVID-19 across the US.

Authors:  Sidney Aung; Eric Vittinghoff; Gregory Nah; Anthony Lin; Sean Joyce; N Clay Mann; Gregory M Marcus
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Paramedic Ability in Interpreting Electrocardiogram with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdullah A Alrumayh; Abdullah M Mubarak; Abdulkarim A Almazrua; Musab Z Alharthi; Deem F Alatef; Turki B Albacker; Fahad M Samarkandy; Yousef M Alsofayan; Muath Alobaida
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2022-08-04

Review 9.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy to Identify ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction on Interpretations of Prehospital Electrocardiograms.

Authors:  Akihito Tanaka; Kunihiro Matsuo; Migaku Kikuchi; Sunao Kojima; Hiroyuki Hanada; Toshiaki Mano; Takahiro Nakashima; Katsutaka Hashiba; Takeshi Yamamoto; Junichi Yamaguchi; Naoki Nakayama; Osamu Nomura; Tetsuya Matoba; Yoshio Tahara; Hiroshi Nonogi
Journal:  Circ Rep       Date:  2022-05-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.