BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Cost and cost effectiveness of behavioral interventions are critical parts of dissemination and implementation into non-academic settings. Due to the lack of indicative data and policy makers' increasing demands for both program effectiveness and efficiency, cost analyses can serve as valuable tools in the evaluation process. METHODS: To stimulate and promote broader use of practical techniques that can be used to efficiently estimate the implementation costs of behavioral interventions, we propose a set of analytic steps that can be employed across a broad range of interventions. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: Intervention costs must be distinguished from research, development, and recruitment costs. The inclusion of sensitivity analyses is recommended to understand the implications of implementation of the intervention into different settings using different intervention resources. To illustrate these procedures, we use data from a smoking reduction practical clinical trial to describe the techniques and methods used to estimate and evaluate the costs associated with the intervention. Estimated intervention costs per participant were $419, with a range of $276 to $703, depending on the number of participants.
BACKGROUND/ PURPOSE: Cost and cost effectiveness of behavioral interventions are critical parts of dissemination and implementation into non-academic settings. Due to the lack of indicative data and policy makers' increasing demands for both program effectiveness and efficiency, cost analyses can serve as valuable tools in the evaluation process. METHODS: To stimulate and promote broader use of practical techniques that can be used to efficiently estimate the implementation costs of behavioral interventions, we propose a set of analytic steps that can be employed across a broad range of interventions. RESULTS/ CONCLUSIONS: Intervention costs must be distinguished from research, development, and recruitment costs. The inclusion of sensitivity analyses is recommended to understand the implications of implementation of the intervention into different settings using different intervention resources. To illustrate these procedures, we use data from a smoking reduction practical clinical trial to describe the techniques and methods used to estimate and evaluate the costs associated with the intervention. Estimated intervention costs per participant were $419, with a range of $276 to $703, depending on the number of participants.
Authors: Sandra A Mitchell; Cheryl A Fisher; Clare E Hastings; Leanne B Silverman; Gwenyth R Wallen Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Richard A Winett; Brenda M Davy; Jyoti Savla; Elaina L Marinik; Sarah A Kelleher; Sheila G Winett; Tanya M Halliday; David M Williams Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Gila Neta; Russell E Glasgow; Christopher R Carpenter; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Borsika A Rabin; Maria E Fernandez; Ross C Brownson Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: C J Peek; Russell E Glasgow; Kurt C Stange; Lisa M Klesges; E Peyton Purcell; Rodger S Kessler Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Russell E Glasgow; V Paul Doria-Rose; Muin J Khoury; Mohammed Elzarrad; Martin L Brown; Kurt C Stange Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: David R Lairson; Yu-Chia Chang; Theresa L Byrd; Judith Lee Smith; Maria E Fernandez; Katherine M Wilson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: David R Lairson; Melissa Dicarlo; Ashish A Deshmuk; Heather B Fagan; Randa Sifri; Nora Katurakes; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Sendecki; Heidi Swan; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lynn L Debar; Lindsay Kindler; Francis J Keefe; Carla A Green; David H Smith; Richard A Deyo; Katharine Ames; Adrianne Feldstein Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2012-08-30 Impact factor: 3.046