OBJECTIVE: To evaluate three theory-based interventions aimed at increasing the rate at which primary care physicians recommend smoking cessation services to smokers. DESIGN:Primary care physicians (n = 251) were randomized to one of four conditions: (a) information based on social cognitive theory (SCT) targeting outcome expectations, (b) information based on SCT + elaboration likelihood model, (c) feedback based on self-perception theory, or (d) control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intentions to recommend and self-reported recommendations of smoking cessation services 1 week postintervention. RESULTS: Data were analyzed using covariance and mean structure analysis. Compared with the control group, only the SCT group reported more frequently recommending services (mean difference = 1.1 recommendations per week, Cohen's d = 0.46) and higher intentions. Mediation analysis was consistent with increased intentions resulting from changes in outcome expectations. There was no evidence that changes in intentions explained self-reported behavior change. CONCLUSION: The study provides preliminary "proof of principle" for further studies incorporating more robust outcome measures. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate three theory-based interventions aimed at increasing the rate at which primary care physicians recommend smoking cessation services to smokers. DESIGN: Primary care physicians (n = 251) were randomized to one of four conditions: (a) information based on social cognitive theory (SCT) targeting outcome expectations, (b) information based on SCT + elaboration likelihood model, (c) feedback based on self-perception theory, or (d) control. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intentions to recommend and self-reported recommendations of smoking cessation services 1 week postintervention. RESULTS: Data were analyzed using covariance and mean structure analysis. Compared with the control group, only the SCT group reported more frequently recommending services (mean difference = 1.1 recommendations per week, Cohen's d = 0.46) and higher intentions. Mediation analysis was consistent with increased intentions resulting from changes in outcome expectations. There was no evidence that changes in intentions explained self-reported behavior change. CONCLUSION: The study provides preliminary "proof of principle" for further studies incorporating more robust outcome measures. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved
Authors: Michelle M Cloutier; Howard Tennen; Dorothy B Wakefield; Kevin Brazil; Charles B Hall Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2012-05-26 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Laurel Liang; Susanne Bernhardsson; Robin W M Vernooij; Melissa J Armstrong; André Bussières; Melissa C Brouwers; Anna R Gagliardi Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 7.327